3
$\begingroup$

There are two versions of fractional Sobolev spaces.

Definition 1: (Via Gagliardo semi-norm) Let $1\leq p\leq +\infty$, $0<s<1$ and let $\Omega\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ be an open set. The fractional Sobolev space $W^{s,p}(\Omega)$ is defined to be

$$ W^{s,p}(\Omega) = \left\{ u\in L^p(\Omega) : \frac{|u(x)-u(y)|}{|x-y|^{\frac{n}{p} + s}} \in L^p(\Omega\times\Omega) \right\}$$

equipped with the norm

$$ \|u\|_{W^{s,p}(\Omega)} = \left( \int_\Omega |u|^p \; dx + \int_\Omega\int_\Omega \frac{|u(x)-u(y)|^p}{|x-y|^{n+ sp}} \; dx dy \right)^{1/p}. $$

Definition 2: (Via Fourier Transform) For $s\in\mathbb{R}$, $1<p<\infty$, and $n\geq 1$, define the Sobolev space $H^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ by $$H^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n}):=\left\{f\in\mathcal{S}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) : \|(\langle{\xi}\rangle^{s}\widehat{f})^{\vee}\|_{L^{p}}<\infty\right\},$$ equipped with the norm $$\|f\|_{H^{s,p}}=\|(\langle{\xi}\rangle^{s}\widehat{f})^{\vee}\|_{L^{p}}$$ where $$\langle{\xi}\rangle^{s} =(1+|\xi|^2)^s$$

From these definitions, I have a couple of questions.

  1. What are the values of $p\in[1,\infty)$ such that $W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ and $H^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ coincide?

I have found that this is true for $p=2$, that is $$W^{s,2}(\mathbb{R}^{n})=H^{s,2}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$$

Do we still have equality or one sided inclusion for some $p\neq 2$? If yes, which one? if no, please provide me with some counterexample or reference.

  1. Next I would like to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of using one of the spaces $W^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$ and $H^{s,p}(\mathbb{R}^{n})$.

I know that the definition $W^{s,p}(\Omega)$ makes sense on any domain, which is not the case for $H^{s,p}(\Omega)$ due to the lack of Fourier transforms.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ For $H^{s,p}$, did you mean to take the completion of this space? As currently defined, it is a subspace of Schwartz space that is not complete with the norm you gave it. $\endgroup$ Dec 16, 2017 at 17:17
  • $\begingroup$ @ItaiBar-Natan in fact you are right it is the completion. The schwarz space is there only to insure that the Fourier makes sense:) $\endgroup$
    – Guy Fsone
    Dec 16, 2017 at 17:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This seems to be basically the same as the question you posted on math.SE: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2569423/… $\endgroup$ Dec 17, 2017 at 6:29

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

This is standard and well explained in several treatises: the space $W^{s,p}$ belongs to the scale of Besov spaces, while $H^{s,p}$ is in the scale of Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. The two scales satisfy mutual embeddings but the spaces concide only when they are $L^2$ based, while they are different when $p\neq 2$ (provided $s$ is not an integer). A good reference is the texbook by Runst and Sickel, Sobolev Spaces of Fractional order; or Triebel, Interpolation spaces (where the case of domains is analyzed in detail).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.