Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 24, 2021 at 1:44 comment added Yuval Peres Note that the 1-3 tress has only countably many rays, so the percolation probability is zero by countable additivity
Nov 20, 2017 at 23:21 vote accept Or Meir
Nov 20, 2017 at 12:10 comment added Florian Lehner I just edited in a proof sketch which I think generalises to higher degrees.
Nov 20, 2017 at 12:08 history edited Florian Lehner CC BY-SA 3.0
added 518 characters in body
Nov 20, 2017 at 11:47 comment added Florian Lehner I think the first proof of this can be found in R. Lyons, Random Walks and Percolation on Trees, Ann. Probab. 18 (3): 931-958, 1990.
Nov 20, 2017 at 8:09 comment added Or Meir Where can I find the proof that the percolation probability of the 1-3-tree is 0?
Nov 19, 2017 at 23:59 comment added Or Meir Thanks! The 1-3-tree is a good example. I cannot think of a reason for my trees not to have a similar structure. However, the average degree of the 1-3-tree is 2, which is rather small, whereas the average degree in my trees can be an arbitrary large constant. In order to get my question fully answered, I still need to check if the 1-3-tree can be changed to have a larger average degree.
Nov 19, 2017 at 23:08 history answered Florian Lehner CC BY-SA 3.0