Let G=(V,E)$G=(V,E)$ be a given networksimple undirected graph. Denote byDefine an $S_k \subset V$mmd$k$s in $G$ (for 'maximal minimum degree $k$ subset') to be the maximalany subset $S$ of nodes$V$ such that in the induced subgraph $G_k=(S_k, E_k)$ (where $E_k=E\cap S_k \times S_k$)
- the subgraph induced by $S$ in $G$ has minimum degree $\geq k$,
- $S$ is $\subseteq$-maximal w.r.t. property 1.
Moreover, all agents have at leastfor any $k$ connections, i.elet $\mathrm{smmds}(G,k):=\sup\{ \lvert S \rvert \colon\text{$S$ is an mmd$k$s in $G$}\}$.
Moreover, for any class $i\in S_k \Rightarrow \sum_{j\in S_k} g_{ij}\geq k$$\mathbb{G}$ of graphs, wherelet $G$ denotes the unweighted adjacency matrix$\mathrm{smmds}(\mathbb{G},k):=\sup\{ \mathrm{smmds}(G,k)\colon G\in\mathbb{G}\}$.
My question is whether for a given $k$ the set $S_k$ corresponds to a known quantity
- mmd$k$s's
- the graph invariant $\mathrm{smmds}(\cdot,k)$,
have already been analysed and named in the graph theory literature.
I am interested in understanding how the cardinality of set $S_k$ changes$\mathrm{smmds}(\cdot,k)$, varies, as a function of $k$, for different families of graphs (or certain random graph models).