Skip to main content
since S shows up differently in the accepted answer, I changed the name of the site to Q.
Source Link
David Spivak
  • 8.7k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 64

A Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is equivalent to the category of sheaves on some site $S$$Q$. We say a sheaf $X\colon S^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$$X\colon Q^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$ is constant if it is the sheafification of a constant presheaf, i.e. one that factors through the terminal map $S^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$$Q^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$.

But what if we forget the site $S$$Q$ and consider $X$ as an object in the topos? Can we characterize the property of $X\in\mathcal{E}$ being constant? More specifically, two questions:

  1. Is the property of $X$ being constant dependent on the choice of site $S$$Q$?
  2. Is there a way to characterize constant objects in the internal language of $\mathcal{E}$?

A Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is equivalent to the category of sheaves on some site $S$. We say a sheaf $X\colon S^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$ is constant if it is the sheafification of a constant presheaf, i.e. one that factors through the terminal map $S^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$.

But what if we forget the site $S$ and consider $X$ as an object in the topos? Can we characterize the property of $X\in\mathcal{E}$ being constant? More specifically, two questions:

  1. Is the property of $X$ being constant dependent on the choice of site $S$?
  2. Is there a way to characterize constant objects in the internal language of $\mathcal{E}$?

A Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is equivalent to the category of sheaves on some site $Q$. We say a sheaf $X\colon Q^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$ is constant if it is the sheafification of a constant presheaf, i.e. one that factors through the terminal map $Q^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$.

But what if we forget the site $Q$ and consider $X$ as an object in the topos? Can we characterize the property of $X\in\mathcal{E}$ being constant? More specifically, two questions:

  1. Is the property of $X$ being constant dependent on the choice of site $Q$?
  2. Is there a way to characterize constant objects in the internal language of $\mathcal{E}$?
added 60 characters in body
Source Link
David Spivak
  • 8.7k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 64

A Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is equivalent to the category of sheaves on some site $S$. We say a sheaf $X\colon S^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$ is constant if it is the sheafification of a constant presheaf, i.e. one that factors through the terminal map $S^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$.

But what if we forget the site $S$ and consider $X$ as an object in the topos? Can we characterize the property of $X\in\mathcal{E}$ being constant? More specifically, two questions:

  1. Is the property of $X$ being constant dependent on the choice of site $S$?
  2. Is there a way to characterize constant objects in the internal language of $\mathcal{E}$?

A Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is equivalent to the category of sheaves on some site $S$. We say a sheaf $X\colon S^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$ is constant if it factors through the terminal map $S^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$.

But what if we forget the site $S$ and consider $X$ as an object in the topos? Can we characterize the property of $X\in\mathcal{E}$ being constant? More specifically, two questions:

  1. Is the property of $X$ being constant dependent on the choice of site $S$?
  2. Is there a way to characterize constant objects in the internal language of $\mathcal{E}$?

A Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is equivalent to the category of sheaves on some site $S$. We say a sheaf $X\colon S^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$ is constant if it is the sheafification of a constant presheaf, i.e. one that factors through the terminal map $S^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$.

But what if we forget the site $S$ and consider $X$ as an object in the topos? Can we characterize the property of $X\in\mathcal{E}$ being constant? More specifically, two questions:

  1. Is the property of $X$ being constant dependent on the choice of site $S$?
  2. Is there a way to characterize constant objects in the internal language of $\mathcal{E}$?
Source Link
David Spivak
  • 8.7k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 64

Characterize constant objects in the internal language of a topos?

A Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$ is equivalent to the category of sheaves on some site $S$. We say a sheaf $X\colon S^{\text{op}}\to\mathsf{Set}$ is constant if it factors through the terminal map $S^{\text{op}}\to \{*\}$.

But what if we forget the site $S$ and consider $X$ as an object in the topos? Can we characterize the property of $X\in\mathcal{E}$ being constant? More specifically, two questions:

  1. Is the property of $X$ being constant dependent on the choice of site $S$?
  2. Is there a way to characterize constant objects in the internal language of $\mathcal{E}$?