Skip to main content
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by David Roberts, Martin Sleziak, Yemon Choi, Dima Pasechnik, LSpice
changed link from PDF to the arXiv page (with abstract, metadata, links to previous versions, etc)
Source Link
Yemon Choi
  • 25.8k
  • 9
  • 69
  • 156

I have always found union closed conjecture very interesting. There is an arxiv articlearxiv article claiming the solve the problem. My background is not appropriate to read the proof. Is this proof verified or wrong? Any comment would be appreciated.

The article was submitted in 2015 and it is not too long(about ten pages). Thus, I expect that it should be verified until now.

I have always found union closed conjecture very interesting. There is an arxiv article claiming the solve the problem. My background is not appropriate to read the proof. Is this proof verified or wrong? Any comment would be appreciated.

The article was submitted in 2015 and it is not too long(about ten pages). Thus, I expect that it should be verified until now.

I have always found union closed conjecture very interesting. There is an arxiv article claiming the solve the problem. My background is not appropriate to read the proof. Is this proof verified or wrong? Any comment would be appreciated.

The article was submitted in 2015 and it is not too long(about ten pages). Thus, I expect that it should be verified until now.

edited tags
Link
GH from MO
  • 105.2k
  • 8
  • 292
  • 398
added 83 characters in body
Source Link
mesel
  • 1.2k
  • 7
  • 18

I have always found union closed conjecture very interesting. There is an arxiv article claiming the solve the problem. My background is not appropriate to read the proof. Is this proof verified or wrong? Any comment would be appreciated. (Article

The article was submitted in 2015 and it is not too long(about ten pages). Thus, I expect that it should be verified until now.

I have always found union closed conjecture very interesting. There is an arxiv article claiming the solve the problem. My background is not appropriate to read the proof. Is this proof verified or wrong? Any comment would be appreciated. (Article was submitted in 2015)

I have always found union closed conjecture very interesting. There is an arxiv article claiming the solve the problem. My background is not appropriate to read the proof. Is this proof verified or wrong? Any comment would be appreciated.

The article was submitted in 2015 and it is not too long(about ten pages). Thus, I expect that it should be verified until now.

Source Link
mesel
  • 1.2k
  • 7
  • 18
Loading