Timeline for Classification of (complex algebraic) vector bundles on punctured affine space
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:27 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Mar 12, 2017 at 13:30 | vote | accept | Qfwfq | ||
Mar 10, 2017 at 15:46 | answer | added | Jason Starr | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 18:21 | comment | added | Jorge Vitório Pereira | Related question: mathoverflow.net/questions/35788/… | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 18:19 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
Mar 6, 2017 at 18:18 | comment | added | Qfwfq | @Mohan: maybe they could be given by different equivariant structures on the same bundle? | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 18:17 | comment | added | Mohan | Using weighted actions, you have weighted projective spaces as quotients and shouldn't they give you other vector bundles? | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 18:17 | comment | added | Qfwfq | Edited the question. | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 18:07 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 232 characters in body
|
Mar 6, 2017 at 18:00 | history | edited | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 232 characters in body
|
Mar 6, 2017 at 17:55 | answer | added | Ben McKay | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 17:51 | comment | added | Qfwfq | I realize now that I should have phrased question 1. differently. Vector bundles on $\mathbb{P}^n$ giving already a rich moduli problem, I should have probably rather concentrated on asking if there are non-equivariant bundles on $X_n$... | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 17:28 | comment | added | Jason Starr | The pullback of the tangent bundle from $\mathbb{P}^n$ is nontrivial for every $n\geq 2$. | |
Mar 6, 2017 at 17:26 | history | asked | Qfwfq | CC BY-SA 3.0 |