The Quillen-Suslin theorem asserts that there are no nontrivial vector bundles over the affine space $\mathbb{A}^{n+1}$, $n\geq 0$. Let's work over the complex numbers. What can be said about vector bundles on the punctured affine space $X_n=\mathbb{A}^{n+1}\smallsetminus\{0\}$? According to this paper, there seem to be room for nontrivial vector bundles.

Let $\mathbb{C}^{*}$ act on $X_n$ by the action $\lambda.(x_0,\dots,x_n):=(\lambda x_0,\lambda x_1,\dots, \lambda x_n)$ whose quotient is $\mathbb{P}^n$. Notice that equivariant v.b. on $X_n$ are in bijection -via pullback- with v.b. on $\mathbb{P}^n$, and the latter form already a rich moduli problem on its own. In this question we concentrate on the specificity of $X_n$

1. Is there some sort of classification of v.b. on $X_n$, taking as a starting base -say- the "classification" of stable v.b. on $\mathbb{P}^n$ given by the corresponding moduli spaces?

What about particular ranks, for example the case of line bundles?

2. Are there vector bundles on $X_n$ that are not pullbacks of v.b. on $\mathbb{P}^n$, that is, v.b. on $X_n$ that do not admit an equivariant structure?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The pullback of the tangent bundle from $\mathbb{P}^n$ is nontrivial for every $n\geq 2$. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Mar 6 '17 at 17:28
  • $\begingroup$ I realize now that I should have phrased question 1. differently. Vector bundles on $\mathbb{P}^n$ giving already a rich moduli problem, I should have probably rather concentrated on asking if there are non-equivariant bundles on $X_n$... $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq Mar 6 '17 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ Edited the question. $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq Mar 6 '17 at 18:17
  • $\begingroup$ Using weighted actions, you have weighted projective spaces as quotients and shouldn't they give you other vector bundles? $\endgroup$ – Mohan Mar 6 '17 at 18:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Related question: mathoverflow.net/questions/35788/… $\endgroup$ – Jorge Vitório Pereira Mar 6 '17 at 18:21

I spoke to my colleague Song Sun, and he reminded me of a discussion that he and I had about Question 2 some time ago. For $n\geq 2$, there are many examples of locally free sheaves on $X_{n} = \mathbb{A}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\}$ that admit no equivariant structure. Denote by $S$ the polynomial ring $\mathbb{C}[x_0,\dots,x_n]$. Denote by $S_+$ the maximal ideal $\langle x_0,\dots,x_n \rangle$. Let $\underline{f}=(f_0,\dots,f_n)$ be a regular sequence of elements in $S_+$.

Associated to this regular sequence there is a Koszul complex $(K_\bullet(\underline{f}),d_\bullet)$ of $S$-modules where $K_0(\underline{f})$ equals $S$, where $K_1(\underline{f})$ equals $S^{\oplus(n+1)}$, where $K_r(\underline{f})$ is the $r^{\text{th}}$ exterior power of $K_1(\underline{f})$, and where $d_r:K_r(\underline{f}) \to K_{r-1}(\underline{f})$ is the unique sequence of $R$-module homomorphisms such that $d_1(g_1,\dots,g_n) = f_1g_1 + \dots + f_ng_n$ and such that $(K_{\bullet}(\underline{f}),d_\bullet)$ is a differential graded $R$-algebra. To be precise, $d_{r-1}\circ d_r$ equals the zero homomorphism, and $d_{r+s}(\alpha \wedge \beta) = d_r(\alpha)\wedge \beta + (-1)^r\alpha\wedge d_s(\beta)$ for every $r,s\geq 0$, for every $\alpha\in K_r(\underline{f})$, and for every $\beta\in K_s(\underline{f})$.

For every integer $r\geq 1$, denote by $Z_r(\underline{f})$ the kernel of $d_r$. Since $\underline{f}$ is a regular sequence, this is the same as the image of $d_{r+1}$. Thus, also define $Z_0(\underline{f})$ to be the image of $d_1$, i.e., the ideal $I$ generated by $\underline{f}$. In particular, $Z_{n+1}(\underline{f})$ is the zero module, and $Z_n(\underline{f})$ is $K_{n+1}(\underline{f})$.

Fact 1. For all $r$ with $1\leq r \leq n$, $Z_r(\underline{f})$ is a reflexive $S$-module.

Proof. By construction $K_r(\underline{f})$ is a free $S$-module, hence reflexive, and $K_{r-1}(\underline{f})$ is torsion-free (even free). The kernel of every $S$-module homomorphism from a reflexive module to a torsion-free module is reflexive. QED

Fact 2. For $M=Z_{n-1}(\underline{f})$, the first Fitting ideal $\text{Fitt}_1(M)$ equals the ideal $I$ generated by $(f_0,\dots,f_n)$.

Proof. The Fitting ideal can be computed from any finite presentation of $M$. For $Z_{n-1}(\underline{f})$, one such presentation is $d_{n+1}:K_{n+1}(\underline{f}) \to K_n(\underline{f})$. By self-duality of the Koszul complex, the Fitting ideal of $d_{n+1}$ is $I$. QED

Since the Fitting ideal is intrinsic, if $M$ is equivariant, then $I$ is a homogeneous ideal. However, there are many $S_+$-primary ideals $I$ that are generated by a regular sequence, yet are not homogeneous ideals. For instance, one example is $$\underline{f}=(x_0,x_1,\dots,x_{n-2},x_{n-1}-x_n^2,x_n^3).$$ For $n\geq 2$, for such $\underline{f}$, the module $M=Z_{n-1}(\underline{f})$ is reflexive, the restriction of $\widetilde{M}$ to $\mathbb{A}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\}$ is locally free (visibly it is locally free on each $D(f_i)$ for $i=0,\dots,n$). Yet $\widetilde{M}$ is not equivariant since $I$ is not a homogeneous ideal.

Edit. Song Sun asked the following variant of the question. For a reflexive $S$-module that is locally free on $\mathbb{A}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\}$ and whose Fitting ideals are all homogeneous, is the module equivariant? Also, note that every module as constructed above (also allowing other syzygy modules of the complexes) has rank $\geq n$. So here is a second variant: is every reflexive $S$-module that is locally free on $\mathbb{A}^{n+1}\setminus\{0\}$ equivariant provided that the rank is $\leq n-1$?

  • $\begingroup$ Interesting. What about line bundles? Can $M$ ever have rank $1$? $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq Mar 10 '17 at 16:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The rank of $M$ equals $n$. Since the construction above only works for $n\geq 2$ (so that we know that $Z_{n-1}(\underline{f})$ is reflexive), it does not give examples of line bundles. $\endgroup$ – Jason Starr Mar 10 '17 at 16:05

Jean-Pierre Serre, Prolongement de faisceaux analytiques coh ́erents, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 16 (1966), no. fasc. 1, 363–374. MR MR0212214 (35 #3088) p. 372 proves that there are infinitely many distinct holomorphic line bundles on $\mathbb{C}^2-0$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Wait but, if I understand correctly, Serre does the case of analytic vector bundles, which on a nonprojective variety might be rather different from the algebraic ones. $\endgroup$ – Qfwfq Mar 6 '17 at 18:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Indeed, the analytic and algebraic cases are very different here; any algebraic line bundle on $\mathbb{A}^2 - 0$ is trivial. Both algebraically and analytically, any line bundle on $\mathbb{A}^2 - 0$ trivializes on $\mathbb{C} \times \mathbb{C}^{\ast}$ and $\mathbb{C}^{\ast} \times \mathbb{C}$, so it is determined by the gluing function, a non-vanishing function on $\mathbb{C}^{\ast} \times \mathbb{C}^{\ast}$. $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Mar 6 '17 at 18:22
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Algebraically, every such function is of the form $\alpha x^i y^j$ for some scalar $\alpha$, and thus can be written as the product of $\alpha x^i$, which extends to $\mathbb{C}^{\ast} \times \mathbb{C}$, and $y^j$, which extends to $\mathbb{C}^{\ast} \times \mathbb{C}$. Thus, this line bundle is trivial. $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Mar 6 '17 at 18:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Every algebraic vector bundle on $\mathbb C^2- 0$ extends to an algebraic vector bundle on $\mathbb C^2$ (see Arapura's answer to mathoverflow.net/questions/35788/…) and therefore must be trivial. $\endgroup$ – Jorge Vitório Pereira Mar 6 '17 at 18:22
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Analytically, $\exp(x^{-1} y^{-1})$ is an example of a non-vanishing holomorphic function on $\mathbb{C}^{\ast} \times \mathbb{C}^{\ast}$ which cannot be written as a product of a function which extends to $\mathbb{C} \times \mathbb{C}^{\ast}$ and one which extends to $\mathbb{C}^{\ast} \times \mathbb{C}$, so it gives a line bundle which is holomorphically nontrivial. $\endgroup$ – David E Speyer Mar 6 '17 at 18:23

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.