Timeline for Are there any informal rules to follow before submitting a paper? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 21:29 | history | closed |
Michael Albanese Alex Degtyarev R.P. Lucia user1073 |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 20:51 | comment | added | Stefan Kohl♦ | I'd say all the things you mention are optional, and this is hardly specific to a particular country. Also, the order in which you do them will in practice usually depend mainly on organizational issues -- for example your department may want you to give seminar talks at a certain frequency, or a suitable conference takes place on a particular date, or you may get an invitation from some other department to give a talk. Whether or not to submit to arXiv is optional as well -- though if the paper is interesting, it is good to have it available online somewhere as soon as it is ready. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 18:31 | history | edited | Tony Huynh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved title.
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 18:20 | comment | added | asv | @Willie Wong: Thanks! I added posting to arxiv. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 18:18 | history | edited | asv | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2016 at 18:04 | comment | added | Bill Johnson | Write the paper in good English. There are at least three grammatical mistakes in your post. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:35 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 21, 2016 at 21:31 | |||||
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:34 | answer | added | Gerhard Paseman | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:30 | comment | added | Andy Putman | Those are all good things to do, though not always necessary (not all papers make good talks; some percentage of my papers are really technical and intended to provide tools for more concrete things, and I prefer to talk about the concrete things). What I do is to first email copies to everyone I think might be interested, then wait a week to see if anyone sends comments, then post to the arXiv, then wait a week to see if anyone sends comments, then finally submit. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:15 | comment | added | Federico Poloni | Has already been asked there: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5711/…. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:01 | comment | added | Willie Wong | (1) The Academia Stackexchange may be a better place for this question (2) Somehow you did not include the obvious step of "posting your paper to arXiv". | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:01 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | These all look like good, standard things to do. This question might receive a broader audience at academia.stackexchange.com. | |
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:58 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 21, 2016 at 17:01 | |||||
| Nov 21, 2016 at 16:55 | history | asked | user101448 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |