Timeline for Existence of Limiting Distribution for Moving Regions in Stat. Phys. Models
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2010 at 22:52 | comment | added | fedja | You can lose the top 1 and move one step back getting a new bit on the bottom whose value is very unlikely to be determined by the current state alone even in the sense of Markov chains. On the other hand, most of the time you go forward at linear speed thus making any attempts to play with the bottom bits quite inefficient for controlling the distribution of the top ones. I have put this question on my list of things to think of but, alas, my free time right now is very limited :-(. | |
| May 6, 2010 at 0:25 | comment | added | Did | Nice problem. You write that "This vector isn't by itself a Markov chain": why? | |
| May 4, 2010 at 19:08 | answer | added | Alekk | timeline score: 4 | |
| May 4, 2010 at 17:58 | history | asked | passing by | CC BY-SA 2.5 |