Timeline for stochastically decreasing sequence converges in distribution
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2016 at 6:01 | comment | added | Matthew Junge | Thanks Iosif, I agree. It's a bit embarrasing, but I see now that this is one of the equivalent formulations of convergence in distribution in the Portmanteau lemma. And, thanks Anthony. I can see why "check my math" is not a popular type of post here. I do appreciate the feedback, and will be more conscientious for future posts. | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 19:36 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | You also don't need the random variables to be integer valued. | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 19:33 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | This is fine, and you don't need the independence condition. | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 18:35 | comment | added | Anthony Quas | Hi Matt, This looks fine, but I think people don't much like this questions of the form "please check this proof". | |
| Mar 17, 2016 at 18:17 | history | asked | Matthew Junge | CC BY-SA 3.0 |