1
$\begingroup$

Let $(X_i)_{i=1}^\infty$ be independent nonnegative integer valued random variables. Suppose that $X_n \succeq X_{n+1}$ (in the stochastic dominance sense). Does it follow that $X_n \overset{d}\to X$ for some random variable $X$?

It seems to me that if we let $F_n(k) = \mathbf P[ X_n \leq k]$, then because $X_n \succeq X_{n+1}$, we have $F_n(k)$ are increasing, and have limits, $F(k)$. I believe the stochastic dominance also implies that $F(k) \leq F(k+1) \leq 1$ for all $k$. So, it appears $F$ defines a unique distribution for a r.v. $X$. Is this reasoning sound?

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Matt, This looks fine, but I think people don't much like this questions of the form "please check this proof". $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2016 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ This is fine, and you don't need the independence condition. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2016 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ You also don't need the random variables to be integer valued. $\endgroup$ Mar 17, 2016 at 19:36
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Iosif, I agree. It's a bit embarrasing, but I see now that this is one of the equivalent formulations of convergence in distribution in the Portmanteau lemma. And, thanks Anthony. I can see why "check my math" is not a popular type of post here. I do appreciate the feedback, and will be more conscientious for future posts. $\endgroup$ Mar 19, 2016 at 6:01

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.