Timeline for Curves of higher genus
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jan 27, 2016 at 15:10 | vote | accept | J.S.R. | ||
| Jan 27, 2016 at 15:10 | vote | accept | J.S.R. | ||
| Jan 27, 2016 at 15:10 | |||||
| Jan 27, 2016 at 15:10 | vote | accept | J.S.R. | ||
| Jan 27, 2016 at 15:10 | |||||
| Jan 25, 2016 at 17:00 | answer | added | stankewicz | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 25, 2016 at 13:05 | answer | added | abx | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 25, 2016 at 12:32 | comment | added | Ariyan Javanpeykar | The Fermat curves $x^n+y^n+z^n =0$ are candidates. Their genus grows and their Jacobians have many extra automorphisms. For the Jacobian of a curve to be CM its dimension should match up with the rank of its endomorphism algebra, and that doesn't happen here for large $n$. On the other hand, the Jacobian of the Fermat curve does have CM quotients. This fact is exploited very often; see for instance Section III in jstor.org/stable/2946559?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents or Lang's book on Complex Multiplication. | |
| Jan 25, 2016 at 11:51 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 25, 2016 at 12:00 | |||||
| Jan 25, 2016 at 11:51 | history | asked | J.S.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |