Skip to main content
added 8 characters in body
Source Link

We know that, with Axiom of Choice (AC), it can be shown that there exists a finitely additive uniform distribution defined for all subsets of the integers (see, e.g., Hrbacek and Jech 1999, Ch. 11).

I was wondering, WITHOUT AC, whether or not there exists any finitely additive measure defined over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$? Is there a result showing that ZF + {nonexistence of finitely additive measure over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$} is consistent? Thanks!

We know that, with Axiom of Choice (AC), it can be shown that there exists a finitely additive uniform distribution defined for all subsets of the integers (see, e.g., Hrbacek and Jech 1999, Ch. 11).

I was wondering, WITHOUT AC, whether or not there exists any finitely additive measure defined over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$? Is there a result showing that ZF + {nonexistence of finitely additive measure over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$} is consistent?

We know that, with Axiom of Choice (AC), it can be shown that there exists a finitely additive uniform distribution defined for all subsets of the integers (see, e.g., Hrbacek and Jech 1999, Ch. 11).

I was wondering, WITHOUT AC, whether or not there exists any finitely additive measure defined over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$? Is there a result showing that ZF + {nonexistence of finitely additive measure over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$} is consistent? Thanks!

Source Link

Finitely additive measure over integers

We know that, with Axiom of Choice (AC), it can be shown that there exists a finitely additive uniform distribution defined for all subsets of the integers (see, e.g., Hrbacek and Jech 1999, Ch. 11).

I was wondering, WITHOUT AC, whether or not there exists any finitely additive measure defined over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$? Is there a result showing that ZF + {nonexistence of finitely additive measure over $\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$} is consistent?