Skip to main content
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link

I was trying to understand the paper "Forms of GL(2) from the analytic point of view", by Gelbart and Jacquet.

On Page 226 in Remark (4.13) they mention that the kernel of the local intertwining operator $M(\eta_{\nu})$ is has codimension one.

However, I cannot immediately see this. Any ideas?

I was trying to understand the paper "Forms of GL(2) from the analytic point of view", by Gelbart and Jacquet.

On Page 226 in Remark (4.13) they mention that the kernel of the local intertwining operator $M(\eta_{\nu})$ is has codimension one.

However, I cannot immediately see this. Any ideas?

I was trying to understand the paper "Forms of GL(2) from the analytic point of view", by Gelbart and Jacquet.

On Page 226 in Remark (4.13) they mention that the kernel of the local intertwining operator $M(\eta_{\nu})$ has codimension one.

However, I cannot immediately see this. Any ideas?

I was trying to understand the paper "Form"Forms of GL(2) from analayticthe analytic point of view", by Gelbart and Jacquet.

On Page 226 in Remark (4.13) they mention that the kernel of the local intertwining operator $M(\eta_{\nu})$ is has codimension one.

However, I cannot see immediately seesee this. Any ideas?

I was trying to understand the paper "Form of GL(2) from analaytic point of view", by Gelbart and Jacquet.

On Page 226 in Remark (4.13) they mention that the kernel of the local intertwining operator $M(\eta_{\nu})$ is has codimension one.

However, I cannot see immediately see this. Any ideas?

I was trying to understand the paper "Forms of GL(2) from the analytic point of view", by Gelbart and Jacquet.

On Page 226 in Remark (4.13) they mention that the kernel of the local intertwining operator $M(\eta_{\nu})$ is has codimension one.

However, I cannot immediately see this. Any ideas?

edited tags
Link
GH from MO
  • 105.4k
  • 8
  • 293
  • 398
deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading