Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 9, 2015 at 14:52 comment added Allen Knutson I'm definitely in favor of these being the minuscule representations of $G$, which are the cohomology groups of the cominuscule flag manifolds of the Langlands dual group $G^L$. The co- is for the Langlands duality. (The minuscule flag manifolds are also important; they're the ones that Hodge-degenerate to Stanley-Reisner schemes of order complexes of Bruhat order. I don't know any reason to look at the irreps associated to cominuscule fundamental weights.)
Feb 8, 2015 at 14:52 comment added Jim Humphreys @ronggang: The usual term is "minuscule" (though "cominuscule" also occurs in some contexts). See the explicit entry in Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minuscule_representation (but note that the concept comes originally from Bourbaki and others). There is also a recent monograph by Richard Green: Combinatorics of minuscule representations. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, 199. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013
Feb 7, 2015 at 22:09 comment added ronggang @ Sasha: Thanks, that's exactly what I want.
Feb 7, 2015 at 22:08 comment added Jim Humphreys As Sasha points out, this is all standard material. You might also search the Math Overflow pages for questions involving the term "minuscule".
Feb 7, 2015 at 20:50 comment added Sasha Google for cominuscule representations.
Feb 7, 2015 at 20:20 history asked ronggang CC BY-SA 3.0