Skip to main content
37 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 25, 2014 at 11:49 comment added JRN The thirty-six officers problem.
Oct 23, 2014 at 5:16 comment added JRN I propose Myerson's Observation: "If we are going to add theorems named after the wrong people then we will be here all day."
Oct 22, 2014 at 22:28 history closed Yemon Choi
Boris Bukh
Chris Godsil
Suvrit
Mariano Suárez-Álvarez
Not suitable for this site
Oct 22, 2014 at 22:05 comment added Gerry Myerson Yes, I believe that's known as Yemon's Observation.
Oct 22, 2014 at 22:02 answer added dfan timeline score: 0
Oct 22, 2014 at 21:46 answer added Bruno Stonek timeline score: 2
Oct 22, 2014 at 21:42 answer added Todd Trimble timeline score: 0
Oct 22, 2014 at 21:33 comment added Yemon Choi Oh come on - if we are going to add theorems named after the wrong people then we will be here all day...
Oct 22, 2014 at 21:33 comment added Noam D. Elkies In which case add "Platonic solids".
Oct 22, 2014 at 21:13 answer added Yoav Kallus timeline score: 1
Oct 22, 2014 at 20:25 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 2
Oct 22, 2014 at 20:10 comment added Ali Caglayan You could argue to some extent about Pell's equations. Pell had nothing to do with them.
Oct 22, 2014 at 19:46 review Close votes
Oct 22, 2014 at 22:32
Oct 22, 2014 at 18:48 answer added Dietrich Burde timeline score: 11
Oct 22, 2014 at 18:38 comment added Nate Eldredge @WillJagy: See also the Going Down Theorem.
Oct 22, 2014 at 15:12 comment added user5117 The Soul Theorem is one that comes to mind.
Oct 22, 2014 at 14:25 history reopened Zurab Silagadze
Denis Serre
Dirk
Stefan Kohl
Noam D. Elkies
Oct 22, 2014 at 12:01 comment added Gerry Myerson The Dining Philosophers Problem seems to have some relation to the Byzantine Generals Problem, marknelson.us/2007/07/23/byzantine
Oct 22, 2014 at 11:19 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Oct 22, 2014 at 8:50 review Reopen votes
Oct 22, 2014 at 14:27
Oct 22, 2014 at 7:42 comment added Peter McNamara voted to close because it's nowhere near research level. I'm not sure whether or not this is on-topic at math.SE because I don't know enough about that site.
Oct 22, 2014 at 7:40 history closed Andrés E. Caicedo
Eric Wofsey
Qiaochu Yuan
Stefan Waldmann
Peter McNamara
Not suitable for this site
Oct 22, 2014 at 7:33 answer added Lucas Kaufmann timeline score: 12
Oct 22, 2014 at 7:17 history edited Manfred Weis CC BY-SA 3.0
added "conjectures" as admissible answers as their decision is also a problem.
Oct 22, 2014 at 7:08 answer added Igor Khavkine timeline score: 2
Oct 22, 2014 at 7:04 comment added Manfred Weis @NoamD.Elkies since MO 2.0 questions can't be made community wiki by the author (see the answer to this Meta post: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/1713/…)
Oct 22, 2014 at 6:53 history edited Manfred Weis CC BY-SA 3.0
added the "Dining Philosophers Problem"
Oct 22, 2014 at 6:40 history edited Manfred Weis CC BY-SA 3.0
added the "Mother Worm Problem"
Oct 22, 2014 at 6:34 answer added bof timeline score: 3
Oct 22, 2014 at 6:27 comment added Noam D. Elkies This doesn't need to be closed quickly (unless it's a duplicate) but should be made community wiki.
Oct 22, 2014 at 6:17 history edited Manfred Weis CC BY-SA 3.0
added examples of obscure names
Oct 22, 2014 at 6:08 answer added Noam D. Elkies timeline score: 2
Oct 22, 2014 at 5:33 answer added Gerry Myerson timeline score: 15
Oct 22, 2014 at 5:16 review Close votes
Oct 22, 2014 at 7:42
Oct 22, 2014 at 4:59 answer added Robert Israel timeline score: 16
Oct 22, 2014 at 4:35 comment added Will Jagy I thought Happy Ending referred to something completely different.
Oct 22, 2014 at 4:29 history asked Manfred Weis CC BY-SA 3.0