Timeline for Does the notion of a "coherent state" exist in TQFTs? (ETQFTs?)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2014 at 19:01 | comment | added | Manuel Bärenz | @Urs, is a good intuition for classical data something similar to a fibre functor (say, in Tannaka duality)? | |
| Aug 30, 2014 at 3:06 | history | edited | Noah Snyder | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Aug 29, 2014 at 20:28 | comment | added | Urs Schreiber | Maybe one should amplify that such definitions (ncatlab.org/nlab/show/coherent+state+in+geometric+quantization) hence depend on having "pre-quantum" data (often called "classical" data). If you instead have a quantizED field theory without the information of how it came about from quantizATION, say a TQFT or ETQFT given by (just) a functor/n-functor, then these definitions of coherent state won't apply. | |
| Aug 29, 2014 at 15:37 | vote | accept | Manuel Bärenz | ||
| Aug 29, 2014 at 15:37 | comment | added | Manuel Bärenz | Kirwin's paper seems beautiful. Thanks. I guess you meant to write "Mapping Class Groups do not have Kazhdan's Property (T)", as the article title says ;) | |
| Aug 29, 2014 at 14:28 | history | answered | Bruce Bartlett | CC BY-SA 3.0 |