Timeline for "topological" Ochanine genus?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Dec 31, 2020 at 22:44 | history | suggested | cngzz1 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed grammar.
|
| Dec 31, 2020 at 4:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 31, 2020 at 22:44 | |||||
| Feb 26, 2016 at 6:29 | comment | added | Tyler Lawson | I just stumbled across this question again. Dylan Wilson answered it in the affirmative: arxiv.org/abs/1507.05116 | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 10:26 | comment | added | Urs Schreiber | I see, thanks, I was missing the obvious. Yes, you are right (e.g. top of p. 4 in arxiv.org/abs/math/0507184). | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 9:58 | comment | added | Justin Noel | Mild clarification: Since the spectrum of LRS is periodic, I should be asking if Tmf_0(2)$ is the same as their spectrum. Note any orientation lifts to their connective covers canonically up to homotopy so we could rephrase the question in terms of the periodic forms. | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 9:49 | comment | added | Justin Noel | Is there a difference between $tmf_0(2)$ and the elliptic cohomology theory constructed by Landweber, Ravenel, Stong? They construct a (homotopy commutative) orientation on their elliptic cohomology theory as I remember. Their theory has 2 inverted, but I suspect that a construction of $tmf_0(2)$ as an $E_\infty$-ring spectrum would also have 2 inverted. I should admit that I am a bit out of my depth here. | |
| Apr 24, 2014 at 8:53 | history | edited | Urs Schreiber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| Apr 24, 2014 at 0:07 | history | asked | Urs Schreiber | CC BY-SA 3.0 |