Skip to main content
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

In an answer to this questionthis question I was led to show the trick proving that $\mathbb R$ is the fraction field of some strict subring $A\subsetneq \mathbb R=\operatorname{Frac}(A)$.
A crucial point in the trick is the existence of a transcendence basis of $\mathbb R$ over $\mathbb Q$.
So this necessitates the axiom of choice and I would be grateful to a savvy user for confirming (or infirming) my feeling that the existence of such an $A$ is indeed only possible under acceptance of the axiom of choice.

In an answer to this question I was led to show the trick proving that $\mathbb R$ is the fraction field of some strict subring $A\subsetneq \mathbb R=\operatorname{Frac}(A)$.
A crucial point in the trick is the existence of a transcendence basis of $\mathbb R$ over $\mathbb Q$.
So this necessitates the axiom of choice and I would be grateful to a savvy user for confirming (or infirming) my feeling that the existence of such an $A$ is indeed only possible under acceptance of the axiom of choice.

In an answer to this question I was led to show the trick proving that $\mathbb R$ is the fraction field of some strict subring $A\subsetneq \mathbb R=\operatorname{Frac}(A)$.
A crucial point in the trick is the existence of a transcendence basis of $\mathbb R$ over $\mathbb Q$.
So this necessitates the axiom of choice and I would be grateful to a savvy user for confirming (or infirming) my feeling that the existence of such an $A$ is indeed only possible under acceptance of the axiom of choice.

Source Link
Georges Elencwajg
  • 47.5k
  • 14
  • 159
  • 241

Are the reals really a fraction field?

In an answer to this question I was led to show the trick proving that $\mathbb R$ is the fraction field of some strict subring $A\subsetneq \mathbb R=\operatorname{Frac}(A)$.
A crucial point in the trick is the existence of a transcendence basis of $\mathbb R$ over $\mathbb Q$.
So this necessitates the axiom of choice and I would be grateful to a savvy user for confirming (or infirming) my feeling that the existence of such an $A$ is indeed only possible under acceptance of the axiom of choice.