Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 25, 2014 at 23:30 history edited Ricardo Andrade CC BY-SA 3.0
replaced deprecated tag 'geometry'; rewrote title
Feb 25, 2014 at 21:01 vote accept domotorp
Feb 25, 2014 at 21:01 answer added domotorp timeline score: 16
Jul 3, 2013 at 13:09 history edited domotorp CC BY-SA 3.0
added 86 characters in body
Mar 13, 2010 at 22:08 answer added gowers timeline score: 4
Mar 13, 2010 at 16:24 comment added domotorp If U is very big and only a very small part of S is out from it, then this is the case.
Mar 13, 2010 at 11:15 comment added gowers Suppose you have an arbitrary union U of unit squares and another unit square S. Is it possible that the ratio of the length of the part of the boundary of S that is not in U to the area of S\U is greater than 4? I presume it is, or else there would be an easy inductive proof. Or is it that this is essentially the question one wants to answer?
Mar 13, 2010 at 8:04 answer added user1688 timeline score: 1
Feb 17, 2010 at 14:54 comment added Pandelis Dodos If Conjecture 8.3 in Gyenes' Thesis is true, then if (S_1,...,S_n) is an extreme set of unit squares (i.e. perimeter(H)/Area(H)=4 where H is the union of S_1,...,S_n) then every subset of (S_1,...,S_n) is extreme. Can someone prove this property directly (i.e. without characterizing the extreme cases)?
Feb 13, 2010 at 18:23 history edited domotorp CC BY-SA 2.5
added 35 characters in body; edited tags
Feb 13, 2010 at 16:40 comment added Anton Petrunin If you have this thesis, could you scan it and make it available?
Feb 13, 2010 at 16:17 comment added TonyK Don't be so sensitive François! You don't have to answer, even though you were commanded to :-)
Feb 13, 2010 at 15:30 comment added François G. Dorais Note how your question is phrased as a command.
Feb 13, 2010 at 15:14 history asked domotorp CC BY-SA 2.5