Timeline for Explicit family of generalized elliptic curves with level n structure
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2013 at 2:06 | comment | added | Steven Sam | I'm not sure if this is relevant, but for $n=5$, there is a nice expression for these level $5$ structures using Pfaffians, which is discussed in many places, for example Fisher's paper arxiv.org/abs/1110.3520 or (to self-advertise) my paper with Gruson (section 2.2) arxiv.org/abs/1301.5276 The latter has an explicit family over $P^1$ whose singular fibers are pentagons | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 19:59 | history | edited | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 364 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2013 at 12:11 | history | edited | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar
|
| Sep 11, 2013 at 10:42 | history | edited | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1151 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2013 at 10:06 | comment | added | Hugo Chapdelaine | Suppose that you are an Italian geometer who does not know about the Tate curve. How do you see that a family of elliptic curves with full level $n$ structure degenerates to a cyclic configuration to $kn$ copies of $P^1$? | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 1:55 | comment | added | Felipe Voloch | What is it that you want that the Tate curve does not provide? | |
| Sep 10, 2013 at 23:24 | history | edited | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 10, 2013 at 22:45 | history | edited | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected mathematical mistakes
|
| Sep 10, 2013 at 21:41 | history | asked | Hugo Chapdelaine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |