Return to Answer

replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/

Source Link

edited Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57

This should follow from the Salamander lemma, which, as you found out in your previous MO question,previous MO question, can be proved without the use of elements. It is a nice exercise, so I won't spell it out for you.

Source Link

created Feb 2, 2010 at 14:35

Chris Schommer-Pries

27.5k
3
91
171

This should follow from the Salamander lemma, which, as you found out in your previous MO question, can be proved without the use of elements. It is a nice exercise, so I won't spell it out for you.