Skip to main content
Add the obvious point about meeting some polynomialconditions, as well avoiding others.
Source Link
Colin McLarty
  • 11.1k
  • 37
  • 79

Deligne's monograph “Le Groupe Fondamental de la Droite Projective Moins Trois Points” begins by remarking that when X is the projective line over the complex numbers, minus three points: "every finite cover of X can be described by equations with algebraic number coefficients."

see http://www.math.ias.edu/files/deligne/GaloisGroups.pdf

Is the proof something like the Hilbert irreducibility theorem?

I mean is it like the following? For any cover given by a complex polynomial in two variables, the finitely many complex coefficients can be regarded as variables which can then be specialized to algebraic values which willmeet whatever rational polynomial conditions as the originals did while avoiding finitely many others, to give an isomorphic cover (just by avoiding any specialization that meets certain polynomial conditions gotten from the original coefficients). Or will I waste my time if I try to formulate such conditions?

Deligne's monograph “Le Groupe Fondamental de la Droite Projective Moins Trois Points” begins by remarking that when X is the projective line over the complex numbers, minus three points: "every finite cover of X can be described by equations with algebraic number coefficients."

see http://www.math.ias.edu/files/deligne/GaloisGroups.pdf

Is the proof something like the Hilbert irreducibility theorem?

I mean is it like the following? For any cover given by a complex polynomial in two variables, the finitely many complex coefficients can be regarded as variables which can then be specialized to algebraic values which will give an isomorphic cover (just by avoiding any specialization that meets certain polynomial conditions gotten from the original coefficients). Or will I waste my time if I try to formulate such conditions?

Deligne's monograph “Le Groupe Fondamental de la Droite Projective Moins Trois Points” begins by remarking that when X is the projective line over the complex numbers, minus three points: "every finite cover of X can be described by equations with algebraic number coefficients."

see http://www.math.ias.edu/files/deligne/GaloisGroups.pdf

Is the proof something like the Hilbert irreducibility theorem?

I mean is it like the following? For any cover given by a complex polynomial in two variables, the finitely many complex coefficients can be regarded as variables which can then be specialized to algebraic values which meet whatever rational polynomial conditions as the originals did while avoiding finitely many others, to give an isomorphic cover. Or will I waste my time if I try to formulate such conditions?

Source Link
Colin McLarty
  • 11.1k
  • 37
  • 79

Algebraic numbers and the complex projective line minus three points

Deligne's monograph “Le Groupe Fondamental de la Droite Projective Moins Trois Points” begins by remarking that when X is the projective line over the complex numbers, minus three points: "every finite cover of X can be described by equations with algebraic number coefficients."

see http://www.math.ias.edu/files/deligne/GaloisGroups.pdf

Is the proof something like the Hilbert irreducibility theorem?

I mean is it like the following? For any cover given by a complex polynomial in two variables, the finitely many complex coefficients can be regarded as variables which can then be specialized to algebraic values which will give an isomorphic cover (just by avoiding any specialization that meets certain polynomial conditions gotten from the original coefficients). Or will I waste my time if I try to formulate such conditions?