Skip to main content

Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$ not equal to $0$. (The ring A is not necessarily a domain, and is not necessarily noetherianNoetherian.) Assume we have an injective map of free $A$-modules $A^m \to A^n$. Must we have $m \le n$?

I believe the answer is yes. For instance, why is there no injective map from A^2 -> A^1 $A^2 \to A^1$? Say it's represented by a matrix (a_1 a_2)$(a_1, a_2)$. Then clearly (a_2, -a_1)$(a_2, -a_1)$ is in the kernel. In the A^{n+1} -> A^{n}$A^{n+1} \to A^{n}$ case, we can look at the n x (n+1)$n \times (n+1)$ matrix which represents it; call it M$M$. Let M_i$M_i$ denote the determinant of the matrix obtained by deleting the ith$i$-th column. Let v$v$ be the vector (M_1 -M_2 ... (-1)^nM_{n+1})$(M_1, -M_2, ..., (-1)^nM_{n+1})$. Then v$v$ is in the kernel of our map, because the vector M*v^T$Mv^T$ has ith$i$-th component the determinant of the (n+1) x (n+1)$(n+1) \times (n+1)$ matrix attained from M$M$ by repeating the ith$i$-th row twice.

That almost finishes the proof, except it is possible that v$v$ is the zero vector. I would like to see either this argument finished, or, even better, a nicer proof.

Thank you!

Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$ not equal to $0$. (The ring A is not necessarily a domain, and is not necessarily noetherian.) Assume we have an injective map of free $A$-modules $A^m \to A^n$. Must we have $m \le n$?

I believe the answer is yes. For instance, why is there no injective map from A^2 -> A^1? Say it's represented by a matrix (a_1 a_2). Then clearly (a_2, -a_1) is in the kernel. In the A^{n+1} -> A^{n} case, we can look at the n x (n+1) matrix which represents it; call it M. Let M_i denote the determinant of the matrix obtained by deleting the ith column. Let v be the vector (M_1 -M_2 ... (-1)^nM_{n+1}). Then v is in the kernel of our map, because the vector M*v^T has ith component the determinant of the (n+1) x (n+1) matrix attained from M by repeating the ith row twice.

That almost finishes the proof, except it is possible that v is the zero vector. I would like to see either this argument finished, or, even better, a nicer proof.

Thank you!

Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$ not equal to $0$. (The ring A is not necessarily a domain, and is not necessarily Noetherian.) Assume we have an injective map of free $A$-modules $A^m \to A^n$. Must we have $m \le n$?

I believe the answer is yes. For instance, why is there no injective map from $A^2 \to A^1$? Say it's represented by a matrix $(a_1, a_2)$. Then clearly $(a_2, -a_1)$ is in the kernel. In the $A^{n+1} \to A^{n}$ case, we can look at the $n \times (n+1)$ matrix which represents it; call it $M$. Let $M_i$ denote the determinant of the matrix obtained by deleting the $i$-th column. Let $v$ be the vector $(M_1, -M_2, ..., (-1)^nM_{n+1})$. Then $v$ is in the kernel of our map, because the vector $Mv^T$ has $i$-th component the determinant of the $(n+1) \times (n+1)$ matrix attained from $M$ by repeating the $i$-th row twice.

That almost finishes the proof, except it is possible that $v$ is the zero vector. I would like to see either this argument finished, or, even better, a nicer proof.

Thank you!

Let A$A$ be a commutative ring with 1$1$ not equal to 0$0$. (The ring A is not necessarily a domain, and is not necessarily noetherian.) Assume we have an injective map of free A$A$-modules A^m -> A^n$A^m \to A^n$. Must we have m <= n$m \le n$?

I believe the answer is yes. For instance, why is there no injective map from A^2 -> A^1? Say it's represented by a matrix (a_1 a_2). Then clearly (a_2, -a_1) is in the kernel. In the A^{n+1} -> A^{n} case, we can look at the n x (n+1) matrix which represents it; call it M. Let M_i denote the determinant of the matrix obtained by deleting the ith column. Let v be the vector (M_1 -M_2 ... (-1)^nM_{n+1}). Then v is in the kernel of our map, because the vector M*v^T has ith component the determinant of the (n+1) x (n+1) matrix attained from M by repeating the ith row twice.

That almost finishes the proof, except it is possible that v is the zero vector. I would like to see either this argument finished, or, even better, a nicer proof.

Thank you!

Let A be a commutative ring with 1 not equal to 0. (The ring A is not necessarily a domain, and is not necessarily noetherian.) Assume we have an injective map of free A-modules A^m -> A^n. Must we have m <= n?

I believe the answer is yes. For instance, why is there no injective map from A^2 -> A^1? Say it's represented by a matrix (a_1 a_2). Then clearly (a_2, -a_1) is in the kernel. In the A^{n+1} -> A^{n} case, we can look at the n x (n+1) matrix which represents it; call it M. Let M_i denote the determinant of the matrix obtained by deleting the ith column. Let v be the vector (M_1 -M_2 ... (-1)^nM_{n+1}). Then v is in the kernel of our map, because the vector M*v^T has ith component the determinant of the (n+1) x (n+1) matrix attained from M by repeating the ith row twice.

That almost finishes the proof, except it is possible that v is the zero vector. I would like to see either this argument finished, or, even better, a nicer proof.

Thank you!

Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$ not equal to $0$. (The ring A is not necessarily a domain, and is not necessarily noetherian.) Assume we have an injective map of free $A$-modules $A^m \to A^n$. Must we have $m \le n$?

I believe the answer is yes. For instance, why is there no injective map from A^2 -> A^1? Say it's represented by a matrix (a_1 a_2). Then clearly (a_2, -a_1) is in the kernel. In the A^{n+1} -> A^{n} case, we can look at the n x (n+1) matrix which represents it; call it M. Let M_i denote the determinant of the matrix obtained by deleting the ith column. Let v be the vector (M_1 -M_2 ... (-1)^nM_{n+1}). Then v is in the kernel of our map, because the vector M*v^T has ith component the determinant of the (n+1) x (n+1) matrix attained from M by repeating the ith row twice.

That almost finishes the proof, except it is possible that v is the zero vector. I would like to see either this argument finished, or, even better, a nicer proof.

Thank you!

edited title
Link
Anton Geraschenko
  • 24k
  • 17
  • 127
  • 180
Loading
edited tags
Link
David Zureick-Brown
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 39
  • 96
Loading
Source Link
CJD
  • 1.1k
  • 1
  • 11
  • 15
Loading