Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286
fixed a typo
Source Link
Manfred Weis
  • 13.2k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 76

Liouville's theorem gives such a proof for antiderivatives of functions like $e^x/x$ or $e^{x^2}$, and differential Galois thorytheory extends that to Bessel functions, say. But what tools exist for implicit functions like Lambert's W?

Liouville's theorem gives such a proof for antiderivatives of functions like $e^x/x$ or $e^{x^2}$, and differential Galois thory extends that to Bessel functions, say. But what tools exist for implicit functions like Lambert's W?

Liouville's theorem gives such a proof for antiderivatives of functions like $e^x/x$ or $e^{x^2}$, and differential Galois theory extends that to Bessel functions, say. But what tools exist for implicit functions like Lambert's W?

Source Link
Feldmann Denis
  • 3.6k
  • 1
  • 20
  • 36

How to prove Lambert's W function is not elementary?

Liouville's theorem gives such a proof for antiderivatives of functions like $e^x/x$ or $e^{x^2}$, and differential Galois thory extends that to Bessel functions, say. But what tools exist for implicit functions like Lambert's W?