Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

Let $f = \sum_n a_n q^n$ be a cuspidal newform of some weight and level. Here I want to view the $a_n$ of $p$-adic numbers (by embedding $\overline{{\bf Q}}_p$ in ${\bf C}$ in some way).

Let $k_f$ denote the finite field generated by the reduction mod $p$ of all of the $a_q$ as $q$ varies over all primes. Let $k'_f$ denote the same field except that we omit a single $a_q$ for one prime $q$.

My question: can $k'_f$ be strictly smaller than $k_f$?

(Compare to the characteristic 0 analogue in:

Field generated by the Fourier coefficients of a modular formField generated by the Fourier coefficients of a modular form

and

A sentence in Shimura's "On The Periods of Modular Forms"A sentence in Shimura's "On The Periods of Modular Forms"

where strong multiplicity one guarantees that the field is unchanged if finitely many $a_q$ are deleted.)

Let $f = \sum_n a_n q^n$ be a cuspidal newform of some weight and level. Here I want to view the $a_n$ of $p$-adic numbers (by embedding $\overline{{\bf Q}}_p$ in ${\bf C}$ in some way).

Let $k_f$ denote the finite field generated by the reduction mod $p$ of all of the $a_q$ as $q$ varies over all primes. Let $k'_f$ denote the same field except that we omit a single $a_q$ for one prime $q$.

My question: can $k'_f$ be strictly smaller than $k_f$?

(Compare to the characteristic 0 analogue in:

Field generated by the Fourier coefficients of a modular form

and

A sentence in Shimura's "On The Periods of Modular Forms"

where strong multiplicity one guarantees that the field is unchanged if finitely many $a_q$ are deleted.)

Let $f = \sum_n a_n q^n$ be a cuspidal newform of some weight and level. Here I want to view the $a_n$ of $p$-adic numbers (by embedding $\overline{{\bf Q}}_p$ in ${\bf C}$ in some way).

Let $k_f$ denote the finite field generated by the reduction mod $p$ of all of the $a_q$ as $q$ varies over all primes. Let $k'_f$ denote the same field except that we omit a single $a_q$ for one prime $q$.

My question: can $k'_f$ be strictly smaller than $k_f$?

(Compare to the characteristic 0 analogue in:

Field generated by the Fourier coefficients of a modular form

and

A sentence in Shimura's "On The Periods of Modular Forms"

where strong multiplicity one guarantees that the field is unchanged if finitely many $a_q$ are deleted.)

Source Link
MF1
  • 115
  • 5

Residue fields of attached to coefficients of modular forms

Let $f = \sum_n a_n q^n$ be a cuspidal newform of some weight and level. Here I want to view the $a_n$ of $p$-adic numbers (by embedding $\overline{{\bf Q}}_p$ in ${\bf C}$ in some way).

Let $k_f$ denote the finite field generated by the reduction mod $p$ of all of the $a_q$ as $q$ varies over all primes. Let $k'_f$ denote the same field except that we omit a single $a_q$ for one prime $q$.

My question: can $k'_f$ be strictly smaller than $k_f$?

(Compare to the characteristic 0 analogue in:

Field generated by the Fourier coefficients of a modular form

and

A sentence in Shimura's "On The Periods of Modular Forms"

where strong multiplicity one guarantees that the field is unchanged if finitely many $a_q$ are deleted.)