Skip to main content
spelling, grammar, formatting
Source Link
Ben McKay
  • 26.3k
  • 7
  • 67
  • 102

Hi,

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well knwonknown fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure, its. It is even Kähler. In this complexification, the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler strucuturesstructures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such kind of structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this allredyalready known or can it be derived easillyeasily?

Dmitri

Hi,

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well knwon fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure, its even Kähler. In this complexification the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler strucutures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such kind of structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this allredy known or can it be derived easilly?

Dmitri

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well known fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure. It is even Kähler. In this complexification, the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler structures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this already known or can it be derived easily?

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Dmitri
  • 101
  • 2

Hi,

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well knwon fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure, its even Kähler. In this complexification the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler strucutures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such kind of structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this allredy known or can it be derived easilly?

Dmitri

Hi,

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well knwon fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure, its even Kähler. In this complexification the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler strucutures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such kind of structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this allredy known or can it be derived easilly?

Hi,

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well knwon fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure, its even Kähler. In this complexification the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler strucutures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such kind of structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this allredy known or can it be derived easilly?

Dmitri

Source Link
Dmitri
  • 101
  • 2

Different complexifications of a real analytic Riemannian manifold

Hi,

I have a question concerning the complexification of a real analytic Riemannian manifold. Let $(M,g)$ be a compact Riemannian manifold. It is a well knwon fact that in a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section of the cotangent bundle $T^{*}M$, $M$ admits a complexification. By Stenzel and Guillemin this complexification is called the adapted complex structure, its even Kähler. In this complexification the phase function $\varphi$ solves the homogenous Monge-Ampere equation. My question is now: are there Kähler strucutures on a neighbourhood $U$ of the zero-section in the cotangent bundle of $M$, which turn $M$ into a Lagrangian submanifold and such that $M$ is isometrically embedded in $U$, BUT differ from the adapted complex structure (up to biholomorphism)? Do all such kind of structures come from an adapted complex structure? Is this allredy known or can it be derived easilly?