Timeline for Universal covering space for non-semilocally simply connected spaces
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2020 at 20:23 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question has been bumped anyway)
|
| Oct 18, 2018 at 15:15 | comment | added | M.Ramana | @JeremyBrazas Yes, of course. I'm wrong. Thanks. | |
| Oct 18, 2018 at 15:06 | comment | added | Jeremy Brazas | @M.Ramana If you mean "indiscrete" instead of "discrete," then yes. | |
| Oct 18, 2018 at 14:58 | comment | added | M.Ramana | @JeremyBrazas From the answer above, can we say that every space $X$, whether it is locally path-connected or not, with discrete $\pi_1^{qtop}(X)$ is a categorical universal covering space for itself? | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Jul 4, 2014 at 14:25 | history | edited | Jeremy Brazas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
adding a link. apparently the old image link died so I'm adding a new one.
|
| Nov 3, 2012 at 23:17 | comment | added | Glen M Wilson | Jeremy, this is perfect! Thank you so much for the answer. | |
| Nov 3, 2012 at 23:12 | vote | accept | Glen M Wilson | ||
| Nov 3, 2012 at 16:15 | history | answered | Jeremy Brazas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |