Skip to main content
While this is on the front page: due -> do; convert list to MathJax list
Source Link
LSpice
  • 13k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

It seems natural to me to generalize the notion of perfect number to rings of integers more general that ${\Bbb Z}$. I'll want to think of number fields concretely, as subfields of ${\Bbb C}$. For a mutatis mutandis definition, a given algebraic integer must have a distinguished finite set of divisors. That makes two tricky parts: figuring out what to say if the group of units is richer than $\{-1,1\}$ making due with the order if the field is not a subfield of ${\Bbb R}$.

  1. figuring out what to say if the group of units is richer than $\{-1,1\}$
  2. making do without the order if the field is not a subfield of ${\Bbb R}$.

Do definitions occur in the literature? Do nontrivial examples exist?

It seems natural to me to generalize the notion of perfect number to rings of integers more general that ${\Bbb Z}$. I'll want to think of number fields concretely, as subfields of ${\Bbb C}$. For a mutatis mutandis definition, a given algebraic integer must have a distinguished finite set of divisors. That makes two tricky parts: figuring out what to say if the group of units is richer than $\{-1,1\}$ making due with the order if the field is not a subfield of ${\Bbb R}$.

Do definitions occur in the literature? Do nontrivial examples exist?

It seems natural to me to generalize the notion of perfect number to rings of integers more general that ${\Bbb Z}$. I'll want to think of number fields concretely, as subfields of ${\Bbb C}$. For a mutatis mutandis definition, a given algebraic integer must have a distinguished finite set of divisors. That makes two tricky parts:

  1. figuring out what to say if the group of units is richer than $\{-1,1\}$
  2. making do without the order if the field is not a subfield of ${\Bbb R}$.

Do definitions occur in the literature? Do nontrivial examples exist?

Source Link
David Feldman
  • 17.6k
  • 8
  • 67
  • 135

Good notions of "perfect number" for rings of integers more general than ${\Bbb Z}$?

It seems natural to me to generalize the notion of perfect number to rings of integers more general that ${\Bbb Z}$. I'll want to think of number fields concretely, as subfields of ${\Bbb C}$. For a mutatis mutandis definition, a given algebraic integer must have a distinguished finite set of divisors. That makes two tricky parts: figuring out what to say if the group of units is richer than $\{-1,1\}$ making due with the order if the field is not a subfield of ${\Bbb R}$.

Do definitions occur in the literature? Do nontrivial examples exist?