Skip to main content
fixed some grammar and spelling; deleted 1 characters in body
Source Link
François G. Dorais
  • 44.4k
  • 6
  • 150
  • 233

About ACthe axiom of choice, the foundamentalfundamental theorem of Algebraalgebra, and real numbers

About foundamentalfundamental theorem of algebra, there is a large collection different demonstrations.

I ask: there is there some proof that avoidavoids AC (choisechoice axiom)  ?

In a general topos (with natural number object) there are the two constructionconstructions of real numbers (generalizationgeneralizations of the classical Dedekind and Cauchy classicalconstructions) that are different.

In ZF theory, are the Dedekind and Cauchy constructions differentdifferent? (inIn the "Cauchy" reals, operates on a real number $r$ through a choosechoice of a Cauchy sequence convergingconverging to $r$).)

About AC, the foundamental theorem of Algebra, and real numbers

About foundamental theorem of algebra, there is a large collection different demonstrations.

I ask: there is some proof that avoid AC (choise axiom)  ?

In a general topos (with natural number object) there are the two construction of real numbers (generalization of the Dedekind and Cauchy classical) that are different.

In ZF theory, are the Dedekind and Cauchy constructions different? (in the "Cauchy" reals, operates on a real number $r$ through a choose of a Cauchy sequence converging to $r$).

About the axiom of choice, the fundamental theorem of algebra, and real numbers

About fundamental theorem of algebra, there is a large collection different demonstrations.

I ask: is there some proof that avoids AC (choice axiom)?

In a general topos (with natural number object) there are the two constructions of real numbers (generalizations of the classical Dedekind and Cauchy constructions) that are different.

In ZF theory, are the Dedekind and Cauchy constructions different? (In the "Cauchy" reals, operates on a real number $r$ through a choice of a Cauchy sequence converging to $r$.)

Source Link
Buschi Sergio
  • 4.2k
  • 1
  • 22
  • 26

About AC, the foundamental theorem of Algebra, and real numbers

About foundamental theorem of algebra, there is a large collection different demonstrations.

I ask: there is some proof that avoid AC (choise axiom) ?

In a general topos (with natural number object) there are the two construction of real numbers (generalization of the Dedekind and Cauchy classical) that are different.

In ZF theory, are the Dedekind and Cauchy constructions different? (in the "Cauchy" reals, operates on a real number $r$ through a choose of a Cauchy sequence converging to $r$).