Skip to main content
Jim Conant's user avatar
Jim Conant's user avatar
Jim Conant's user avatar
Jim Conant
  • Member for 14 years, 3 months
  • Last seen this week
Loading…
comment
Propagation of an error in the LMO invariant? (Revision: I don't think LMO is wrong!)
In particular, he doesn't address address Massuyeau's comment at all. (Nor does he address an innaccuracy noticed by Dylan Thurston.)
awarded
comment
Discrete Morse theory and existence of minimal complex
Yes, that's a shame. Do you know of a good reference for simple-homotopy theory that's easier to find?
Loading…
answered
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Quasi-Lie algebras in nature?
@Torsten: actually, I changed my mind. That's not cheating. You can certainly get nice quasi-Lie algebras by tensoring graded Lie algebras with $\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z$. But it would be nice to have examples over $\mathbb Z$ which contain something besides $2$-torsion.
comment
Quasi-Lie algebras in nature?
@Peter: that's a fair comment.
comment
Quasi-Lie algebras in nature?
@Torsten: yes, that's cheating.
asked
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Repairing the Lie operad in characterstic 2?
@Torsten: I see what you're saying now.
comment
Repairing the Lie operad in characterstic 2?
I don't see what goes wrong if you define a "better" version of the Lie operad by taking the standard Lie operad over the integers, and modding out by symmetric trees of the form [x,x], as Gindi seems to be suggesting. Incidentally, the skew-symmetry axiom defines what's called a quasi-Lie algebra, so the standard Lie operad should really be called the quasi-Lie operad.
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
awarded
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Proofs without words
That's beautiful!