Skip to main content
Somatic Custard's user avatar
Somatic Custard's user avatar
Somatic Custard's user avatar
Somatic Custard
  • Member for 8 years, 5 months
  • Last seen more than a week ago
Loading…
awarded
comment
Is there any math notation for `be denoted by`?
The "walrus operator", as it is known in some circles.
awarded
comment
Help motivating log-structures
@NilsMatthes thanks!
comment
What are some examples of theorem requiring highly subtle hypothesis?
When first learning about universal covers and Galois correspondence of topological spaces, I remember feeling that conditions like "path-connected and semi-locally simply connected" were rather subtle.
comment
Counting/constructing Toric Varieties
@levborisov I believe the answer is yes and that "arithmetic toric varieties" is a relevant term.
awarded
comment
Help motivating log-structures
Do you know where I can find Pottharst's notes? I've been trying to track them down but haven't found them.
comment
References for logarithmic geometry
Is there somewhere else to find these notes? What about the writing by Pottharst mentioned at ncatlab.org/nlab/show/logarithmic+geometry?
comment
Why do combinatorial abstractions of geometric objects behave so well?
@ANonnyMouse I would also be very interested to learn more about the connection between matroids and tropical varieties
awarded
comment
comment
Every mathematician has only a few tricks
More parameters, meaning "catalytic variables"?
comment
How to understand the "boundary" of subscheme, as defined in "An elementary characterisation of Krull dimension"
@HarryGindi I got a sense that something like this was the case, from the first reference, but I'm not used to thinking about lattices and partial orders, so I didn't gain much from this. I know a la here this captures most of Zariski topology, but somehow that doesn't console me.
revised
Loading…
comment
How to understand the "boundary" of subscheme, as defined in "An elementary characterisation of Krull dimension"
Thanks. Still need to think a bit more about your remarks, but it's helpful. It doesn't change your conclusion, but wouldn't $S_{\{p\}}$ invert $p$ and the numbers congruent to $1$ mod $p$? I also suspected they were commutative, but couldn't prove, and had reservations relating to regular sequences (I'm editing to add).
Loading…
comment
comment
Algebraic characterization of commutative rings of Krull dimension 1,2, or 3
I must be missing something, but if $R$ is reduced, can we also require $n=1$? And similarly for higher dimensional rings.
1 2
3
4 5
7