Skip to main content
MathOverflow
C.F.G's user avatar
C.F.G's user avatar
C.F.G's user avatar
C.F.G
  • Member for 8 years, 8 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
Profile Activity

744 Actions

All Accepts Posts Badges Comments Revisions Reviews Suggestions
awarded
 Nice Answer
accepted
What is so special about Chern's way of teaching?
comment
What is an important mathematical question?
Any reference for "Vladimir Arnold disagrees ..."!
revised
Old books you would like to have reprinted with high-quality typesetting
added 12 characters in body
comment
How to translate a graph coloring problem to algebraic or geometric language and solve it?
Did authors use only algebraic/geometrical methods in their proof? if not, your post does not address to my question.
comment
What should one do before submitting a paper?
Fairly, This question is appropriate for academia.stackexchange
revised
Old books you would like to have reprinted with high-quality typesetting
added 197 characters in body
awarded
 Constituent
awarded
 Caucus
revised
Reference for zero sum estimates of Dirichlet L functions
ref.req tag has been added
comment
Positive sectional curvature does not imply positive definite curvature operator?
mathoverflow.net/a/390636/90655
comment
When does the $4\times 4$ 'false Sarrus rule' compute the determinant correctly?
On the Extension of Sarrus’ Rule to nxn
comment
Sarrus determinant rule: references, extensions
Seems confusing! See this one hindawi.com/journals/ijem/2016/9382739
comment
Are the Morse inequalities sharp for 5-manifolds
@DannyRuberman, You mean hidden row? there is no one in front of young-Danny in hidden row!
comment
Are the Morse inequalities sharp for 5-manifolds
@DannyRuberman Dennis Barden?
revised
Old books you would like to have reprinted with high-quality typesetting
deleted 370 characters in body
comment
Old books you would like to have reprinted with high-quality typesetting
@PedroLauridsenRibeiro aareyanmanzoor.github.io/assets/hicks.pdf
revised
Old books you would like to have reprinted with high-quality typesetting
added 158 characters in body
revised
Old books you would like to have reprinted with high-quality typesetting
added 190 characters in body
comment
"Determinant" rather than "trace" in the alternative formula "Lefschetz number"
@DenisNardin: Thanks for explaining categorical approach. But I don't consider it as interpretation rather a justification. Your formulation do not say why that procedure deals with fixed points? Is there any definition/concept of the det of $f^*$ in the (derived) category?
1
2
3 4 5
…
38