Skip to main content
Max New's user avatar
Max New's user avatar
Max New's user avatar
Max New
  • Member for 9 years, 1 month
  • Last seen this week
accepted
asked
Loading…
comment
Morphisms in the category of elements
@BartoszMilewski you the mathematician must choose which construction you want. We can view any functor $F : C \to Set$ as either covariant in $C$ or contravariant in $C^op$. You can think of this as a "choice of basis/orientation" for the category, and the output of the Grothendieck construction depends on this choice.
revised
Morphisms in the category of elements
expand on the op part.
Loading…
comment
revised
Morphisms in the category of elements
fix the commuting condition
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
awarded
revised
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
comment
awarded
awarded
revised
In HoTT with LEM, are sets and pointed sets the same thing?
add a suggestion to remove global LEM
Loading…
Loading…
comment
In HoTT with LEM, are sets and pointed sets the same thing?
The category of pointed sets is not equivalent to the category of sets, but the groupoids are because an iso of pointed sets can't send any of the other points to the base point.
comment
Is univalence equivalent to every type function being a functor over equivalence?
Does the formulation of Univalence as saying that type equivalence is an Identity system already meet your criteria of not referring to type equality?