Skip to main content
Andreas Thom's user avatar
Andreas Thom's user avatar
Andreas Thom's user avatar
Andreas Thom
  • Member for 14 years, 4 months
  • Last seen this week
comment
Finite-dimensional subalgebras of $C^\star$-algebras
I do not know. Beautiful question! Do you want to (or may I) ask this as a separate question?
awarded
awarded
answered
Loading…
comment
Fundamental group of Lie groups
Very nice argument!
comment
Finite-dimensional subalgebras of $C^\star$-algebras
I have just learned that Choi-Elliott proved in (ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1081290) that the set of self-adjoint elements with finite spectrum in certain rotation algebras are dense in the set of all self-adjoint elements. (Interestingly, this result is not explicit, in the sense that there is no concrete $\theta$ for which it happens.) However, from what I understand, it seems unclear whether there is a finitely generated dense sub-algebra such that each element has finite spectrum.
Loading…
awarded
revised
Loading…
comment
Telling group algebras apart
Another way of putting it is that every countably dimensional algebra carries a canonical locally convex topology which is called the fine topology. It is a topological algebra with this topology. Moreover, every ${\mathbb C}$-linear map into any other locally convex vector space is continuous. For finitely generated algebra, the pointwise convergence on the generators gives another way of defining the topology on the $Hom$-space.
comment
Telling group algebras apart
I was thinking about the topology of pointwise convergence on elements in ${\mathbb C}[F_n]$.
answered
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Monoidal structures on von Neumann algebras
What if you consider the group measure space construction of the action (of some element in) Thompsons group $F$ on $[0,1]$? There, you have an explicit element of $F$ which maps $[0,1]$ to itself (piecewise linear) such that $[0,1/2],[1/2,3/4],[3/4,1]$ is mapped to $[0,1/4],[1/4,1/2],[1/2,1]$. I think that this algebra (at least the crossed product by this specific automorphism) is a factor of type $III_{1/2}$. This should satisfy the pentagon axiom. In order to make everything (also the tensor product) work at the same time, more work is necessary.
awarded
awarded
revised
Loading…
comment
Monoidal structures on von Neumann algebras
I think that there is still some misunderstanding. The $\sum$-operation applied to two automorphisms would not be an automorphisms. (This is analogous to the fact that the sum of two line-bundles is not a line-bundle.) However, as far as I understand, your construction on the level of algebras would always yield that the sum of two automorphisms is an automorphism.
revised
Monoidal structures on von Neumann algebras
added 3 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Monoidal structures on von Neumann algebras
My reply was to long to for a comment. I edited the original answer instead.