Skip to main content
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob
  • Member for 14 years, 5 months
  • Last seen more than 1 year ago
  • Cambridge, MA
revised
When do limits and colimits of infinity-categories commute?
added some info on the case I'm interested in
Loading…
comment
When do limits and colimits of infinity-categories commute?
@Adeel Thanks, but neither of these is quite what I need. I need index diagrams that are more complicated than just products (so 5.5.8.11 isn't enough), and 5.3.3.3 is only about limits/colimits in the category of spaces (I need the category of stable infty-categories). However, there is something about my case that's not that far from the category of spaces, and I'm editing the question accordingly.
Loading…
revised
Components of a Fiber Product
earlier statement was false. Salvaged it a little.
Loading…
comment
Components of a Fiber Product
Sorry! The fact that $f|_{I^n_X}$ is the identity on the first $r$ coordinates doesn't imply that its image is $I^r\times U$. (@user52824, the incorrect arguments I gave are in fact local).
comment
Is there a finitely presented group with infinite homology over $\mathbb{Q}$?
@Alex: I thought any group homology of a finitely presented group is finite-dimensional. Are there examples where $H_2$ isn't? And yes, "infinite" means infinite-dimensional
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
What is the coefficient ring of algebraic K theory of the discrete $\mathbb{C}$?
There are probably no modifications necessary in this case - thanks. And I'm interested in the torsion-free part, so fine with taking coefficients in any characteristic-zero field. Edited question accordingly.
revised
What is the coefficient ring of algebraic K theory of the discrete $\mathbb{C}$?
removed some parentheticals, added that only interested in torsion-free part
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
awarded
Loading…
comment
What is a higher derived constructible sheaf
@David So it sounds like you're saying (in the algebraic case), that the 'etale topos contains all the topology of a manifold up to some sort of profinite completion, and higher-category analogues of locally constant (resp. constructible) sheaves are well-approximated by sheaves on this topos on the one hand, and therefore by D-modules on the other hand. Is this correct?
accepted
1
19 20
21
22 23
25