Skip to main content
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob's user avatar
Dmitry Vaintrob
  • Member for 14 years, 5 months
  • Last seen more than 1 year ago
  • Cambridge, MA
Loading…
revised
Endomorphism ring as ind-pro object
repalced an instance of ind- with pro-
Loading…
comment
Endomorphism ring as ind-pro object
Right. What I'm looking for should be something like an idempotented algebra (it is supposed to admit a map from the Hecke algebra of a p-adic group)
asked
Loading…
comment
Nomenclature question: a morita-invariant way to say finite-dimensional?
No, I don't think that's it: in order to be able to talk about a $\mathfrak{C}$-module as a $k$-module, you need some sort of fiber functor $\mathfrak{C}\to \text{vect}$, which I'm assuming isn't given.
Loading…
awarded
comment
A three-line proof of global class field theory?
@DavidLoeffler Thanks! Localizing the coefficient field at a prime is certainly ok. I'm not very literate in Galois representations formalism, but the Poitou-Tate result in Nekovar's notes (0.7.1) looks very applicable. Is this what you meant?
comment
A three-line proof of global class field theory?
(with restricted product above). As maps to $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ is an exact contravariant functor and we're hoping $H^0(K, \mathbb{G}_m)$ is Galois-invariant points of $\bar{K}^\times$ (or $\pi_0 K^\times$ in the infinite place case), the exactness of the sequence above would imply this CFT statement.
comment
A three-line proof of global class field theory?
Sure. It's that a Galois character is equivalent to a map from $\prod_{v} K_v^\times$ to $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ which vanishes on $K^\times.$
awarded
comment
What is the first Pontryagin class of the $n$-dimensional representation of $S_n$?
The product map $S_n\times S_m\to S_{m+n}$ should give a coproduct on this cohomology, and you're looking for a class $\alpha$ whose coproduct is $\alpha\otimes 1 + 1\otimes \alpha.$ Maybe this helps narrow it down?
revised
Loading…
revised
A three-line proof of global class field theory?
added brief explanation of nub of argument
Loading…
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
Is forming the Albanese variety a monad?
In this particular case, since Abelian varieties are a full subcategory of pointed varieties, I think you can apply part 5 of Definition 2.1 here ncatlab.org/nlab/show/idempotent+monad to show that indeed taking the Albanese variety is monadic.
comment
Is forming the Albanese variety a monad?
Note that any pair of adjoint functors $L:C\leftrightarrows D :R$ give rise to a monad via the natural transformations $RLRL\overset{LR\to 1}{\to} RL$ and $1\to RL$ given by the unit/counit maps of the adjunction. Any object of $D$ then gives an algebra over this monad via the transformation $RLR\overset{LR\to 1}{\to} R$. A pair is said to be "monadic" if in fact $D$ is equivalent to the category of algebras over $C$. This condition can be checked formally (and holds for most "free-like" functors): see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beck%27s_monadicity_theorem.
awarded
Loading…
1
14 15
16
17 18
25