Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but this new argument seems to work whenever there is a right-invariant metric such that the exponential map is a local diffeomorphism, provided that $V$ is small enough to be a diffeomorphic image of an open ball under exp. I gather this is not known for $Diff_c(R^n)$ but is for Diff(S^1) with the $H^k$ metrics, when k is at least 1?
Thanks! although I'm not sure how simplicity might help here (?) Here's a different way to think of the same kind of question with a more metric formulation: put your favorite (complete, left-invariant) metric on Diff_c(M). Is there k so that every diffeomorphism in the epsilon ball about the identity is the product of k elements in the epsilon/2 ball?