Skip to main content
ADL's user avatar
ADL's user avatar
ADL's user avatar
ADL
  • Member for 14 years, 6 months
  • Last seen this week
revised
Loading…
comment
When is a generalised Baumslag-Solitar group linear?
@Carl-FredrikNybergBrodda Whoops - fixed it! Thanks.
revised
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
awarded
comment
Exponent of a group
I do not understand the sentence "every finite group $G$ of exponent $3$ such as $3$ does not divide $o(G)$". If $G$ is a finite group of exponent $3$ then it has order $3^n$, and so $3$ divides $o(G)$, so no groups satisfy this condition. Right? (I realise this is over 10 years old, so sorry for dredging it up!)
awarded
comment
Are groups with every proper, non-trivial subgroup infinite cyclic simple?
@AchimKrause I was meaning trying to adapt the general proof of the case when $G/\langle x\rangle$ is finite to when $G/\langle x\rangle$ is torsion. It is a standard fact that if $G$ is torsion-free, $\langle x\rangle$ infinite cyclic and $G/\langle x\rangle$ is finite and then $G$ must be infinite cyclic - so can the proof be adapted?
comment
Are groups with every proper, non-trivial subgroup infinite cyclic simple?
@AchimKrause Yes, I was getting tangled up with groups of this form too. I tried to mimic the proof that if $G$ is torsion-free and $G/\langle x\rangle$ is finite then $G$ is cyclic, and the idea here is to prove that $G$ splits. So for example if $H^2(G/\langle x\rangle, \mathbb{Z})=0$ then we'd be done, but I cannot see why this would be $0$.
accepted
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Are groups with every proper, non-trivial subgroup infinite cyclic simple?
@MikaeldelaSalle I meant to exclude that possibility! I'll edit the question to rule it out.
revised
Loading…
Loading…
1
4 5
6
7 8
13