Skip to main content
KP Hart's user avatar
KP Hart's user avatar
KP Hart's user avatar
KP Hart
  • Member for 14 years, 7 months
  • Last seen this week
awarded
comment
A problem on the box topology
The topologies are different. See Dugundji's Topology, Appendix I, 4.3: if $S$ has cardinality $2^{\aleph_0}$ (or larger) then $\mathcal{C}$ is not locally convex. The box topology is generated by products of intervals and hence locally convex.
comment
Pseudocompactness, countable compactness and locally finite open covers
$P_2$ has been called feeble compactness since 1955: wikipedia
revised
Construction of nonmeasurable sets
deleted 5 characters in body
Loading…
awarded
revised
Construction of nonmeasurable sets
inserted (unordened!)
Loading…
answered
Loading…
Loading…
revised
A strictly descending chain of subalgebras of $P(\omega)/_{\mathrm{fin}}$
Added a reference to a 40-year old answer to the original question.
Loading…
comment
Continuous maps between Peano continua
How should I read "2 implies 1"? "If for some $Y$ the space $C(X,Y)$ does not have an isolated point, then $C(X,X)$ does not have one"? Or "If for all $Y$ $\ldots$"?
awarded
awarded
revised
Loading…
comment
Extensions of bounded uniformly continuous functions
The $d_n$s are taken from the family of compatible pseudometrics on $X$, and $d$ is constructed on $X$ from the $d_n$.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
comment
Sieve for an infinite array of sets, resulting in an array of the same size of pairwise disjoint sets
That is not quite the gist. It states that the assumption on sets of cardinality $\lambda$ is not an assumption but a fact: since the $E^\nu_\xi$ are pairwise disjoint $\xi\mapsto \min(E^\nu_\xi\cap T)$ is an injection into $T$, where $\xi$ runs through the indices corresponding to a nonempty intersection. And second: Hajnal indicates how to prove this, by induction.
1 2
3
4 5
35