Skip to main content
Stefan Mesken's user avatar
Stefan Mesken's user avatar
Stefan Mesken's user avatar
Stefan Mesken
  • Member for 10 years, 4 months
  • Last seen more than 4 years ago
awarded
comment
Does Con(ZF + Reinhardt) really imply Con(ZFC + I0)?
The link in my previous comment no longer works. Here is an updated link to Gabe's talk.
awarded
comment
Explicit, small resolving sets for Hamming graphs
@kodlu $\infty$ is included since the graph may not be connected. And one relevant paper is chapter 6 of ON THE METRIC DIMENSION OFCARTESIAN PRODUCTS OF GRAPHS.
comment
Explicit, small resolving sets for Hamming graphs
@Bullet51 Any resolving set of small size that you can make available to me (so that I can actually use it in an algorithm) counts as 'explicit'.
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
awarded
comment
Amalgamation via elementary embeddings
@MonroeEskew My previous comment meant to say that Andreas' answer does indeed give a positive answer to your question, at least if we also assume that $V$ satisfies the ultrapower axiom.
comment
Amalgamation via elementary embeddings
If $V$ is an extender model (it is enough to assume that $V$ satisfies the ultrapower axiom), then this idea of amalgamating $M_0, M_1$ works and the diagram commutes.
awarded
revised
V=L and a Well-Ordering of the Reals
improved formatting and fixed two typos
Loading…
suggested
Approve
awarded
comment
The complexity of sorting a list having one free cell
To clarify: A move consists of switching an occupied row with the empty row?
comment
Loading…
comment
Function $f:\kappa\to\alpha$ with small fibers where $\alpha\in\kappa$
@Qfwfq How do you prove $|\coprod_{x\in \alpha}f^{-1}(\{x\})|\leq\alpha\beta$ in $\mathrm{ZF}$ if you don't have a choice function $x \mapsto i_x \colon f^{-1}(\{x\}) \to \beta$?
comment
Does $0^{\#}$ imply that $L$'s set generic multiverse has irreconcilable theories?
@Joel I've thought about that as well. Unfortunately $V$ and $L$ massively disagree about what $\mathrm{Coll}(\kappa, \kappa^{+})$ is... I've also thought about reflecting a possible failure via (very) large cardinals and then use something along the lines of proposition 3. But thus far I don't see how to do it.
1
2 3 4 5
8