Skip to main content
dorebell's user avatar
dorebell's user avatar
dorebell's user avatar
dorebell
  • Member for 10 years, 4 months
  • Last seen more than a month ago
  • Palo Alto, CA, United States
comment
The kernel of a nef line bundle
Oops, I missed this - sorry for posting the same answer! They must have gone up around the same time.
revised
The kernel of a nef line bundle
added 1 character in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
The kernel of a nef line bundle
Sorry, I misread the question!
comment
Example of an integral scheme which is geometrically connected but not geometrically irreducible
We have \begin{align*} X \times_{\mathrm{Spec}\ k} \mathrm{Spec}\ \overline{k} &= (X \times_{\mathrm{Spec}\ k'} \mathrm{Spec}\ k') \times_{\mathrm{Spec}\ k} \mathrm{Spec}\ \overline{k}\\ &= X \times_{\mathrm{Spec}\ k'} \mathrm{Spec}\ (k' \otimes_k \overline{k})\\ &= X \times_{\mathrm{Spec}\ k'} \left( \sqcup_{k' \hookrightarrow \overline{k}} \mathrm{Spec}\ \overline{k}\right) \\ &= \sqcup_{k' \hookrightarrow \overline{k}} \left(X \times_{\mathrm{Spec}\ k'} \overline{k}\right) \end{align*} This is not connected, since $k'/k$ is a non-trivial separable extension.
comment
Example of an integral scheme which is geometrically connected but not geometrically irreducible
But an element of $K(X)$ which is algebraic over $k$ is certainly integral over $A$, so it is an element of $K(X)$. Let $k'$ be the separable closure of $k$ in $K(X)$; then we've shown that $X$ is naturally a $k'$-scheme ($k'$ doesn't depend on the choice of affine open), and that it is geometrically irreducible over $k'$ (since $k'$ is separably closed in $K(X)$).
comment
Example of an integral scheme which is geometrically connected but not geometrically irreducible
I was surprised by the statement when $X$ is normal, and I couldn't find a proof online, so here's a sketch of the argument I worked out for future reference: We can work affine-locally on $X$, so assume $X = \mathrm{Spec}(A)$ for $A$ an integrally closed domain. It suffices to show that $A \otimes_k \overline{k}$ has a unique minimal prime ideal. Since field extensions are flat and $A$ injects into $K(X)$, it suffices to show that $K(X) \otimes_k \overline{k}$ has a unique minimal prime ideal. This is equivalent to $k$ being separably closed in $K(X)$.
comment
Example of an integral scheme which is geometrically connected but not geometrically irreducible
Thanks, Jason! If you'll submit this as an answer, I'll accept it.
Loading…
comment
What is the precise relationship between forcing on a poset and the topos of double-negation sheaves on this poset?
Thanks for the reference. The paper addresses the questions I had in mind, but for the sake of completeness, would you mind clarifying what it means to interpret a formula in the language of set theory in $V^{\mathrm{Sh}(\mathbb{P})}$, and what this has to do with the Kripke-Joyal semantics of the topos?
Loading…
revised
Rational maps and Kodaira dimension
added 162 characters in body
Loading…
awarded
revised
Rational maps and Kodaira dimension
added 404 characters in body
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
Is there a "Langlands philosophy" reason for the fact that the L-function of the Jacobi theta function is (almost) the Riemann zeta function?
Which automorphic $L$-functions do not come from Galois representations? What is the explanation for them?
comment
Is there a "Langlands philosophy" reason for the fact that the L-function of the Jacobi theta function is (almost) the Riemann zeta function?
Great, this feels like the "right" reason. I've never heard of the Shimura correspondence or thought about automorphic forms for the metaplectic group - can you say a little more about how this interpretation goes? Also, why does the theta function have trivial nebentypus? I thought the functional equation involved some power of $i$?
1
5 6
7
8 9
11