Skip to main content
mathahada's user avatar
mathahada's user avatar
mathahada's user avatar
mathahada
  • Member for 14 years, 9 months
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
A "dimension" for Tychonoff spaces
The Sorgenfrey line, or the uncountable product of the two-point discrete space, are both zero dimensional and yet satisfy D(X)=c. So this operation does not behave very nicely with non metrizable spaces.
comment
What is your favorite proof of Tychonoff's Theorem?
How do you define the associated "non standard space" to a standard space?
comment
Proof synopsis collection
It's probably a bit late, but David MJC is simply... wrong. For a non compact space, it is not sufficient that the map strictly reduces distances, as can be seen by the map x + 1/x which has no fixed points. The computation with geometric series is essential - the mapping has to be a contraction.
comment
Characterization of Tychonoff spaces in terms of open sets
There's a natural bijection between the set of continuous functions from a $T_0$ space to the Sierpinski space and the topology of the space, but there's no such bijection between the topology of a regular space and the the set of continuous functions to the unit interval. I don't know category theory so I don't know how to make this precise but I think you should get the intuitive feeling that the Sierpinski space is in some sense canonical and minimal. Anyway the answer given is what I've been looking for (I actually read the book but managed to miss that part)
comment
Characterization of Tychonoff spaces in terms of open sets
I don't think, because it still makes a reference to an external object.
Loading…
answered
Loading…
awarded
answered
Loading…