Skip to main content
Pierre-Yves Gaillard's user avatar
Pierre-Yves Gaillard's user avatar
Pierre-Yves Gaillard's user avatar
Pierre-Yves Gaillard
  • Member for 15 years, 2 months
  • Last seen this week
awarded
revised
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
comment
Does the Cantor-Schröder-Bernstein Theorem hold in the category opposite to the category of noetherian commutative rings?
@YCor - I hope you saw Angelo's comment. (At the end of the question I mentioned Eric Wofsey' example of a non-surjective epimorphic endomorphism of a noetherian ring.)
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Prove that $\left(\frac{x^n+1}{x^{n-1}+1}\right)^n+\left(\frac{x+1}{2}\right)^n\geq x^n+1$
Is it ok to post on MO a question another user posted on MSE without even mentioning in the question that it was somebody else's idea?
revised
Loading…
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Possible similarities between a category and its category of endofunctors
@LSpice - Thanks for your comment. The main partial result is that (as indicated in the post) the properties are equivalent for posets. I had previously asked if (P2) implies (P1). Apparently nobody knows. So I thought that answers to closely related questions might shed some light on the question asked before, and that, asking many such related questions was a way of maximizing the probability of getting some of them answered. I wish I had better ideas about how to tackle the main question.
comment
Loading…
answered
Loading…
comment
Cauchy reals and Dedekind reals satisfy "the same mathematical theorems"
@FrançoisG.Dorais - What do you exactly mean by "if $A'$ is any isomorphic structure to $A$, then the isomorphism of $A'$ and $A$ lifts uniquely to an isomorphism of $V(A')$ and $V(A)$"? [I'm asking this because it seems to me that $A'$ equipotent to $A$ does not imply $V_1(A')$ equipotent to $V_1(A)$ --- take $A=\{\varnothing\},A'=\{\{\varnothing\}\}$.]
comment
Cauchy reals and Dedekind reals satisfy "the same mathematical theorems"
Very nice! Can't you even start with two complete ordered fields and show that if the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture holds over one, it holds over the other?
1 2 3
4
5
26