Skip to main content
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen's user avatar
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
  • Member for 14 years, 9 months
  • Last seen this week
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Product lattice
edited tags
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Good lattice theory books?
added arXiv tag for lattice theory: "ra.rings-and-algebras"
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Condensation for L[U]
edited tags
Loading…
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
Loading…
comment
How to select a journal?
Had to vote this up out of patriotism, but actually these ratings don't seem perfect. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis is a 2, whereas Transactions of the AMS is a 1?
comment
Proving boundedness of continuous images of [0,1] in WKL0
"Continuous function" has a special definition in reverse mathematics which does not seem to mentioned in Wikipedia yet, but which I allude to in my answer. For in-depth study of this subject one should get hold of Simpson's book Subsystems of Second Order Arithmetic.
comment
Proving boundedness of continuous images of [0,1] in WKL0
I think that's basically the definition of continuity. Since every object in reverse math that belongs to the model must be represented by an element or a subset of $\mathbb N$, one cannot just use the set-theoretical definition of a function. You're right, a set being $\Sigma_1$ definable in the model does not imply the set is in the model, just that there is a $\Sigma_1$ formula with parameters from the model that defines the set.
1
77 78
79
80 81
84