Skip to main content
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
Jim Humphreys's user avatar
Jim Humphreys
  • Member for 14 years, 10 months
  • Last seen more than 4 years ago
awarded
Loading…
comment
Relation of the normalizers of maximal tori in reductive Lie groups
It might be helpful to explain what you mean by "reductive Lie group", or else to use a more common name lkke "semisimple". The term "reductive" comes from the theory of linear algebraic groups; it suggests complete reducibility of finite dimensional representations, which is only true in characteristic 0, etc.
comment
Lift the relative Frobenius automorphism to zero characteristic
Have you looked at Lusztig's lifting of a Frobenius map to a quantied enveloping algebra in characteristic 0?
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Diagonal automorphisms for twisted Chevalley groups
@Sushil: Sorry for the long delay in answering, but it's been a busy week. I did try to add to my answer but didn't succeed. Anyway, I think your formulation is correct. But it's unhelpful in terms of computability. More details to follow.
awarded
Loading…
comment
Progress on the result about montonicity of Kazhdan Lustzig polynomials
Keep in mind the fact that the known result aready covers all cases in which the group is a "Weyl group", though your question is a natural one to raise. (By the way, I just expanded the tags and fixed a couple of small linguistic errors.)
revised
Loading…
revised
Loading…
comment
Is the tensor product of two infinite dimensional objects in the BGG category $\mathcal{O}$ of a semisimple Lie algebra always not in $\mathcal{O}$?
@Johan: As you say, $\mathfrak{g}$ should be simple No, $\rho$ isn't always proportional to a root, as seen in the tables at the end of Chapter VI in Bourbaki.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
1
4 5
6
7 8
231