comment
Invariance of $\mathrm{SO}(3)$ dynamics when expressed via Euler angles
There are many question about Euler angles on our sister site, math.stackexchange.com, see e.g. math.stackexchange.com/search?q=Roll-Pitch-Yaw, but I couldn't quickly find one that answers your question. So I do hope you get a good answer here, but it might be worthwhile to take a look over there also.
comment
How large sample $m$ is enough
@RhastaShaman please note that Iosif and I are not the same person; do the edits Iosif made to the original answer answer your questions?
comment
How large sample $m$ is enough
If you read the answer carefully you see that there is only one place where the ball itself (or its center) is used and that is in the definition of $p$. The number $p$ is the probability of any single point drawn from distribution $D$ to land in this ball. For balls at different location you might get a different actual value of $p$, but if you still call this the abstract letter $p$ (and write $q = 1 - p$) all of the answer stays the same.
comment
How large sample $m$ is enough
Welcome to MO. In order to get better responses it would help to add some context: where did you encounter the problem, what have you tried already yourself, and where did you get stuck?
comment
What's the dimension of the Lie algebra generated by transpositions on $n$ objects?
@Adrien you should post this as an answer. Now it is hidden behind the 'show 11 more comments' button
awarded
awarded
comment
A better way to explain forcing?
I just wanted to say I already really like the beginners guide you wrote! Please let us know if there will be an improved version
comment
Reference request: associative subalgebras of Cayley algebras are at most 4-dimensional
But not all strange normed algebras we can write down do appear as subalgebras of all bigger ones
comment
Reference request: associative subalgebras of Cayley algebras are at most 4-dimensional
Yes with that definition these are indeed normed algebras of stange dimension.
comment
Reference request: associative subalgebras of Cayley algebras are at most 4-dimensional
Over $\mathbb{R}$ the 'ordinary' octonions are waaaaaaay more famous than their split counterpart, due to being a division algebra. However when people started constructing these algebras over general fields the split ones more or less got their revenge as they exist over every field while division algebras do not.
comment
Reference request: associative subalgebras of Cayley algebras are at most 4-dimensional
The split quaternion algebra is isomorphic to the algebra of two by two matrices where the analogue of the square of the norm is the determinant. Inside the two-by-two matrices we have the three dimensional (non-commutative) subalgebra of upper triangular matrices. If we realize the split octonions as the Dickson double of the split quaternion algebra then the Dickson double of the 3D subalg of upper triangular matrices sits inside it as a (nonassociative) 6-dimensional subalgebra
comment
Reference request: associative subalgebras of Cayley algebras are at most 4-dimensional
Only in situations where the 'norm' is zero for certain non-zero elements, so i guess in these situation you won't call it a norm. We still have a quadratic form though, that in the division algebra case over $\mathbb{R}$ is the square of the norm.
revised
Loading…
awarded
Loading…
comment
Can information be extracted more precisely using more random trials?
What is $H$? Any function of the data or something more specific? Also what do we know about the distribution of $(x, y)$?
revised
What are reasons to believe that e is not a period?
Changed K & F to K & Z. I don't know why I typed K & F originally
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Reference request: Oldest books on logic with unsolved exercises?
Aah, I didn't know that