Skip to main content
IMeasy's user avatar
IMeasy's user avatar
IMeasy's user avatar
IMeasy
  • Member for 14 years, 10 months
  • Last seen this week
comment
Hilbert polynomial of a projected variety
OK, I hope you don't mind if I edited.
comment
Hilbert polynomial of a projected variety
Be careful, if $X$ is an hypersurface $\pi$ is far from being birational!
comment
Rationality in Families
In fact such an example is not possible for curves, where rationality correspond to genus 0, and the genus is constant over flat families.
comment
big and small resolutions of singularities of a 4-fold
Thanks for everybody's contribution. I meant exactly what Jason and Sandor say. Could you shortly explain me why? I also expected this to exist, but could not show this.
comment
big and small resolutions of singularities of a 4-fold
Let us supppose it does, just to start with an easier hypothesis.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
comment
Restriction of relative sheaf on a section
It would be useful to know some more on $Y$. Is it a smooth scheme?
comment
Kernel of a multiplication map of global sections of line bundles
I think so. Take a general genus 4 curve, embedded canonically in $\mathbb{P}^3$ as a $(2,3)$ complete intersection. Take $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{O}$, $k=1$ and $n=2$. Then $h^0(\mathcal{O}(3))=20$, the multiplication map seems to have Kernel of dimension 4.
comment
spin bundle vs. hodge bundle
Yeah, both your answer are very nice. It is clear that GRR is the way to get it right. I seem to understand anyway that it would be far too optimistic to expect a quick formula relating the two sheaves.
revised
spin bundle vs. hodge bundle
deleted 22 characters in body
Loading…
comment
spin bundle vs. hodge bundle
Good point. Yes $\pi_{!}\mathcal{S}$ would be ok, I edit the question. I would be curious to see even in the derived category.
asked
Loading…
comment
comment
invariance of the dimension of severi varieties of surfaces
@Sasha: very good point. If I don't assume the ampleness from start, anyway apparently the question still has sense.
1
7 8
9
10 11
25