awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Simple proof of that $k[X]^G$ Cohen-Macaualy ($G$ finite)?
@Steve: Of course (lots of head smacking).
comment
Simple proof of that $k[X]^G$ Cohen-Macaualy ($G$ finite)?
It would be enough to (locally) find a regular sequence consisting of invariants as then $k[X]$ would be free over the subring generated by the sequence and so would $k[X]^G$ being a direct factor of it. It seems that for a polynomial ring the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial of a general linear polynomial might do the trick.
awarded
comment
Basic question about Picard functor
@Veen: Notice that I said invertible scalar, the scalars referring to the base $S$. I.e., the functor associates to $S$ the isomorphism classes of rigidified line bundles on $X\times S$.
comment
Coincidences amongst classifying spaces and Eilenberg Mac-Lane spaces
In any case, disregarding the $K$-notation, the result is true and for the same reason the others are; $\mathbb{H}P^\infty$ is the quotient of $S^\infty$ by $Sp(1)$. The action is free and $S^\infty$ is contractible so (more or less) by definition the quotient is a $BSp(1)$.
comment
Homotopy type of the simplicial action groupoid
From this you also see that it is just the Borel construction (associated if you prefer to geometric realisations).
comment
Basic question about Picard functor
If you change the rigidification by an invertible scalar you get an isomorphic rigidification by letting the scalar act on $L$.
comment
Why should the anabelian geometry conjectures be true?
Note that in the genus $1$ case you do not recover the elliptic curve from its Tate modules. If you twist a (CM-)curve by a rank $1$ projective module over its endomorphism ring then the result will have the same Tate modules but only be isomorphic to the curve if the module is free. The same in some sense holds true in higher genus only that the twists may not be Jacobians. Hence it is crucial to look at the fundamental group and not its abelianisation.
comment
What does the Tannakian formalism reconstruct when fed the category of chain complexes?
@Theo: You are absolutely right, I am glad for the qualifications I put in... I leave my comment in case someone else makes the same mistake or more precisely "enom till straff, androm till varnagel" ("punishment for one, warning to others" a phrase used in old Swedish laws).
revised
Line bundles with integrable connection on abelian varieties
added 604 characters in body
Loading…
comment
What does the Tannakian formalism reconstruct when fed the category of chain complexes?
To me it seems that the $G$-representations in $\mathrm{SVect}$ consist of a graded supervector space together with a differential of superdegree $1$ and internal degree $1$. Such a graded vector spaces can be thought of as a graded vector space where the even vectors of degree $n$ correspond to new degree $2n$ and the odd vectors of degree correspond to new degree $2n+1$. In the new degree the differential is of degree $1$. This looks like the category of complexes (with the Koszul rule built into the monoidal structure as it should).
comment
Line bundles with integrable connection on abelian varieties
@Veen: $\mathrm{Pic}^\tau$ is defined by the condition that the line bundle lie in the $\mathrm{Pic}^\tau$ of each fibre and the same i strue for $\mathrm{Pic}^0$ (though not by definition).
comment
Automorphisms of local fields
It seems to me that the same argument as you gives that all automorphisms for finite extensions of $\mathbb Q_p$ are continuous in the $p$-adic topology (and hence are the identity on $\mathbb Q_p$.
Loading…
comment
Why should the anabelian geometry conjectures be true?
I agree that that seems a tenuous argument. Any convincing argument has to be able to make a distinction between the genus $1$ and higher genus cases.