Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Could you please clarify the question? (I suppose that the last sentence of your post is in doubt and you would like to know if it's a true statement?)
Nichts ueber dein Deutsch zu sagen, aber each triangle which maps onto (0,1,\infty) in the upper half-plane thus becomes an ideal hyperbolic triangle. Actually, a hyperbolic triangle is made like follows: you take three circles in the upper half-plane {(x,y)|y>0} such that all of them are orthogonal to {y=0}. Then their respective segments form the sides of a triangle. This is a hyperbolic triangle. However, each hyperbolic triangle is uniquely determined by its internal angles or side lengths, so you may be looking at a more general object which you name a circular triangle.
@sasquires: all right, I see what you mean. I just picked up the above two matrices virtually at random (I mean I did several tries, but without too much consideration). Your example is much more clever in this regard and finally dots the "i".
If Ax=ax and Bx=bx, in'nit ABx= A(bx) = b Ax = ba x = ab x = a Bx = B(ax) = BAx, for every matrices A, B, and eigenvector x with eigenvalues a, b with respect to these matrices? Then, a, b, should not be necessarily 1.
@Gerry Myerson: Yes, indeed. Once you define the dilogarithm inside the unit disc, you take its analytic continuation in order to define it in the complex plane. The infinite series is not usually considered as a "complete" definition.